patrick_y[PuristSPro Moderator]
33573
My personal views...
I consider tourbillons to be a "Drivetrain" complication and a "Passive" complication. It's something that you don't see.
Chornographs, perpetual calendars, minute repeaters, etc. I consider to be "Active" complications.
Back to passive complications; personally; my favorite passive complication is the Chain and Fusee transmission.
No
By: Dje : January 9th, 2010-11:47
Hi, IMO there are enough tourbillons on dials around. I like plain dials,and prefer to see tourbillons on the back, like in the PPs, in the Reverso Tourbillon (the "simple" one), or in some GP models. The exception would be the Haldimman or the Omega cent...
I've owned the 5101P
By: tourbillon001 : January 9th, 2010-17:01
and it was very nice and stealthy. I love tourbillons and actually prefer to see them on the dial but for this model and most Patek models I think they should be left on the backside. I actually prefer my tourbillons to be in very modern watch IE Richard ...
Tourbillon location
By: revy : January 9th, 2010-18:26
It is a personal preference at some point true enough. However I believe the logic of the hidden Tourbillon is that Patek does this intentional due to the possible exposure to the sun and artificial light that will dry out the oils and lubricants that are...
Patek & Tourbillon
By: T2009 : January 9th, 2010-22:13
Thanks everyone for the personal view you shared... Of course, this discussion can go over and over, and the truth is that there is a cup of tea for every taste out there. Personally, I find other complications more useful, a simple chrono, Annual or Perp...
My personal views...
By: patrick_y : January 10th, 2010-13:14
I consider tourbillons to be a "Drivetrain" complication and a "Passive" complication. It's something that you don't see. Chornographs, perpetual calendars, minute repeaters, etc. I consider to be "Active" complications. Back to passive complications; per...