HPoirot
59
It's all about the deployant
By configuring it with the long part towards you, the deployant will sit on the outer side of your wrist instead of inner, which can be annoying and very noticeable when going through your daily actions.
Same goes for AP ROO deployants, which is why some people i know reverse the straps too.
Why is strap reversed?
I've always been curious about this. On Patek pieces with a deployment clasp, why is the buckle side of the strap at the 6 o'clock, when traditionally it would be at 12 o'clock? I think it looks strange when I look at wrist shots and the tail of the strap...
easier to put on?
I find it much more ergonomic to pull the strap toward yourself to place into the holders. The other way requires that you bend your arm and try to do it on the opposite side.
Correct. That is why I decided to change it.
And to put the longer part in the usual way... I don't think there is a specific reason. Good question, now I Wonder... Best, Nicolas
Related question for strap-switchers
I find that the watch simply sits in a better place on my wrist when worn with the strap reversed from the factory configuration, so I want to swap it too. So how does one release the screw-ended lugs on the officer case? Simply a matter of turning one en...
Yes.
It can prove to be a challenge doing this by yourself particularly if the screws have ben locked down with adhesive. I have always had another person secure one screw with a screwdriver while I used another to back out the screw on the other end. This way...
thanks
Adhesive, as in ordinary glue? Or is there something specific to be used here?
No, not glue.
Patek uses ERGO 4001 but there are some others like the blue loctite which has light adhesion properties that will prevent the screws from backing out but be light enough to be easy to remove later.
preference
Very interesting, never occurred to me to keep the buckle on at 6 o'clock. Always had it at 12, that way I do not have to see the long end of the strap sticking out from my view when on the wrist. Seem so much more intuitive to me but suppose it is a matt...
With the deployant...
I feel it's a matter of design. It's hard to explain but I suppose it's more natural that way. The metal part will close in on your wrist before you click the button folding the strap inward towards u and tucking the rest do the strap in at the 6 o'clock ...
There may have been issues with a patented design
by another manufacturer at the time the Patek folding buckle was introduced. In fact if I'm not mistaken, the name "deployant" may have also been protected. The unique thing about the Patek design was it allowed you to use your existing straps with punche...
secure like bracelet?
Could it be that it is positioned this way to resemble a metal bracelet?
Nautilus Straps are not reversed.
At least mine isn't 5711R. Maybe the Nautilus buckle is designed differently.
It's all about the deployant
By configuring it with the long part towards you, the deployant will sit on the outer side of your wrist instead of inner, which can be annoying and very noticeable when going through your daily actions. Same goes for AP ROO deployants, which is why some ...
Looks vs comfort and practicality
Since reading this initial post it has been on my mind. I have always had the short end of the strap at 12 as it looks so much more natural and I do not have to see the strap stick out on my side. Never even considered it any other way. But have since rea...
I find the deployant buckle
more comfortable, and easier to take on-off, in the "Patek configuration," and use this orientation for all deployants. I know others who prefer just the opposite. Why Patek began to use this orientation I don't know, but it works best for me.