enjoythemusic[WPSPatron]
7656
Here's a pic for you....
..this might make it harder for you to decide, or perhaps easier (this is 'er' version). My wrist is wide yet very thin, measuring at 6.875 inches for visual comparison to others.
My current dilemma
By: Merke : May 6th, 2013-01:23
a greeting to you, I decided to make my next purchase and are oriented on a 5970J or G. ... but reflecting on the figure in question I did not think the same money I can take these 2 watches together .. .. 3940G - 3970J ......... are very tight, what woul...
Easy for me
By: no_frills : May 6th, 2013-07:26
3970J + 3940G for sure. In fact, I have a 3970J... and a 3940P. Not quite the same, I know, but for the reasons dr kol stated, 3940 is just such a classic piece. Also, the 5970J is a beautiful, beautiful piece but for me - and this is a highly personal th...
this is the point
By: Merke : May 6th, 2013-10:46
........ the meaning of the post is just that, my wrist is 17.5 cm and I think a 5970 would be perfect for my wrist, but aesthetically I much prefer the 3970 .. 3940 ... the clock I see a tasty and I thought that with the same money that you take a 5970 I...
examination
By: Merke : May 13th, 2013-12:48
....... perfect as your speech is perfect from the point of view of an amateur, but here in Italy in so many tell me that on a commercial level the choice of taking the 3970j - 3940g is wrong and the logical choice would be the 5970 .... hence my doubts, ...