scotthicks61
63
Boy, not the Patek I would expect
The date is OK and has it's place in Patek historical models but it should be offest in color, not blue like the rest of the dial. The point is, KEEP TO TRADITION even when you add something new! The bezel - Who in the heck let this one pass?!! It's a work of art and obviously engine turned but is it Patek? Not really. Patek had a few bezels in their past that were somewhat obscure but this does not add a thing to the piece. Forget the odd bezels, work with the dial.
Scott
Well, I 'm deceived
By: amanico : July 7th, 2009-11:28
And, as a Celestial Lover, I'm sad. Compared to the 5102 G, or even the new Celestial ( in RG and Platinum ), This one losts a lot of its purity. 1, 1 mm bigger than the " current " Celestials, it is important, and has to be checked in real to cerify if i...
The bezel is 100% ugly!!
By: sadris : July 9th, 2009-00:43
that bezel should be on a Rolex NOT PP, why o why did they ruin such a beautiful watch....if they wanted to make it a little more unique, why not just make case a little bigger maybe 2 colour case like the current but yellow gold and platinum rose and pla...
Awesome!
By: tbh : July 9th, 2009-08:24
Perhaps I'm in the minority, but that is lovely I've always loved the Celestial. It was a watch that called my name when I first saw it; but when I found the price I was saddened to know that one could never be mine. I have a big interest in both astronom...