dr.kol
11333
Aquanaut is a perfect watch for swimming
and if you don't tell anybody, I have also been wearing my 5167 on scuba diving.
Best, Kari
Sorry for you
By: Thy1r : June 11th, 2016-04:52
But happy for me because I take great care of my watches and stuff in general (as I have many other passions and collectibles), but I have one big guideline which is : wear all your watches, drive your vintage cars, play your rarest guitars, drink your fi...
If I remember right,
By: dr.kol : June 11th, 2016-04:52
this RO is water proof to 50 meters. In reality it means shower, no swimming. Your Nautilus is water proof to 120 meter. In reality it means swimming, no scuba diving. Don't swim with watches with less than 100 meters of WR. Rolex, as an example, is a goo...
I totally agree
By: Mark in Paris : June 13th, 2016-07:33
This is the main thing I really found odd when I came to watches at the beginning. As you say, it is totally misleading, for a "normal" client but even for someone who knows a little about watches. That's why I made a post about this issue, before summer,...
As I understand it
By: watch-er : June 13th, 2016-14:12
the watches are placed in a chamber containing water to the desired pressure and, in fact, the watch can withstand 30 meters of static water pressure if its passes the test. Nothing misleading there. The key is the test is in static non moving water. When...
Indeed Bob
By: Mark in Paris : June 13th, 2016-15:12
The testing is made with the right pressure from that level. The thing is that the test doesn't take what I would call "real life use" into account. Hence, in the end, the client who isn't someone aware of all that, when he reads "30m", he concludes that ...
Cool
By: Tonypatch : October 9th, 2016-02:52
Last week I was standing next to an Iranian guy in Frankfurt Airport's Senator lounge, and he had one of those (but might have been an oversized version). Very nice with jeans and trainers (unfortunately I dont own neither).