Compared to the 5004, the 5373P is two millimeters bigger and with a thickness of almost 13 mm, a tad thinner, so the proportions are more harmonious. You also have a sportier look, and a destro configuration. I also doubt that the movement is still the L...
But I remain a loyal fan of the 5004. I love its classical look, the size is perfect, and even the thickness which hints at its movement. A small, perfectly formed, big watch! 😆
I am generally not a fan of PP design but this sportier take will definitely appeal to a younger audience which is probably its main purpose, and therefore a yes from me.
That's one really flashy watch... I suppose I'd wear it if I were wearing a big red leather suit, big black sunglasses (Persol if possible), and wearing gloves with metal spikes and carrying a guitar and a microphone at a rock concert. In the meanwhile, I...
I prefer the classical look. It’s quintessential Patek Philippe. From the “glory days” I feel. I can’t stand the holes in the dial. For me, it is not a harmonious piece. The 5004 is balanced and complete. Everything one needs is there and no more. The new...
Too many to mention but this one is not among them. I can’t understand how they can invest so much effort in to creating this watch because im sure it is top top level in terms of complexity and finishing …but then they start off with such a poor design. ...
They look like they are just thrown in and not part of overall design. I also have an issue with the design of the moon phase. It doesn’t feel like a match with the design of the subials but another language. All my personal opinion, of course
Okay, let’s be honest, it’s a different interpretation something that we purists are not used to YET! We wasn’t used to the 5094 eider when released, and now we love it. Remember the Zenith Daytona, the chronomere Blue? Same here, give it time, and when d...