Well said.... but....

Apr 01, 2009,08:55 AM
 

the reason the "stamping" of the PP seal is better executed than the Geneva Seal is because, I believe, the PP seal is NOT STAMPED on the plate.

In fact, it should be made by something like Computer Numerical Controlled Machine (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNC).

If I have to pick a perfect execution (done by CNC machine) or a less than perfect execution (done by hand), I would prefer the later.

BTW, do you find that the PP seal is TOO simple? I think it has a reason... it is difficult for CNC to make details seal like the Geneva Seal....

Personal, I like the look of the Geneva Seal much more than the ugly PP Seal.... I think. down the road, PP watch carries the Geneva Seal should be more sought-after than the one with PP seal!!! It is lucky that ALL MY PP are having Geneva Seal smile

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Basel 2009: The new Patek Philippe Seal of overall quality!

 
 By: Dje : March 31st, 2009-15:53
The subject of the drop of the Geneva Seal by Patek Philippe has been out for months now. It is now official and we know more about what is to come, even if not all yet. The criteria of the Geneva Seal were observed by Patek Philippe for more than a centu...  

Hmm...

 
 By: Davo : March 31st, 2009-16:01
Yes, I can definitely see some Rolls-Royce influence there.

Aesthetically, I'm not fond of the new seal's logo design...

 
 By: patrick_y : March 31st, 2009-23:22
I think the new seal looks way too much Rolls-Royce-esque. Then again, there aren't many ways to make such a seal, you can't do two symmetrical Ps back to back (it'd look like the Plaza Hotel New York logo). I can't say yet that I think this new seal is a... 

On the other side...

 
 By: Dje : April 4th, 2009-14:21
Hi Patrick, Of course you are free to like the new Seal design or not and the idea of a PP Seal or not! I don't dislike the new Seal (I still have to see it live) and find it quite modern and nicely simply looking! On the fact of having a PP Seal, of cour... 

I am only voicing my indifference......with a counter point

 
 By: WatchFan1 : March 31st, 2009-16:48
Geneva Seal or Patek Seal.......I honestly do not care as long as the quality of the finish is there. There are several watch companies that I admire and the, looks, quality and finish of their calibers (as well a complete watches overall) is superb - and...  

Argh!

 
 By: Moses. : March 31st, 2009-18:45
Please don't post pictures of this calibre, my bank account begs you!

Ahhh, we bring out the greatest weapon against Patek... Lange...

 
 By: patrick_y : April 1st, 2009-01:24
Philippe Dufour, the famous watchmaker owns only a few watches; a few vintage LeCoultres, some Philippe Dufour model prototypes he made himself, and a Lange Datograph. I agree, if Lange were in the province of Geneva, I am sure they would qualify for the ... 

in complete agreement with you milos,

 
 By: dreamer : April 1st, 2009-02:49
To me the PP seal is no more than an evolving Company( PP ) mission statement of their aims and values.To me the "body" is not independent enough.And as Milos states, I love Lange, seal or no seal.

absolutely right! - when you make a watch like that ...

 
 By: eric.vonschonberg : April 4th, 2009-00:48
With the Datograph, the finish is so superb that there is no need for any seal. When you're not Lange, you need a seal to remind the customer that you have *one of* the best finishes out there. If you see a Geneva seal or now a Patek seal, you know that y... 

The finish is indeed superb

 
 By: Dje : April 4th, 2009-14:30
Hi, The finish of the Datograph is indeed superb, but can I ask you why you think that it is superior to what Patek Philippe makes, for instance in the 5070? Not that I have a definitive answer, but as a subject of discussion of course! Cheers Dje

Certainly but....

 
 By: Dje : April 4th, 2009-14:25
Hi, As I see it the problem of Patek Philippe is to leave a Seal and position itself above! So if they want to compare to a Seal they feel they need another Seal, their Seal in this case! Not for us WIS or addicted collectors that know the brand very well... 

Other obvious reasons?

 
 By: Tick Talk : March 31st, 2009-18:11
The most obvious reason, logically speaking, to opt out of the Geneva Seal is the requirement that the movements be constructed in Geneva! Will this new PP seal have the same requirement? Or is there a long term strategy to move from Geneva, for which we ... 

Just suppositions or informations....

 
 By: Dje : April 4th, 2009-14:43
Hi, I doubt that Patek Philippe is planning to leave Geneva as they are building more in Plan Les Ouates! They've been trying for years to concentrate all their production at the same place, I doubt to see them move! Regarding the evolution of the Geneva ... 

Reminds me somewhat of the QF

 
 By: aaronm : March 31st, 2009-19:23
Except without any sort of published standards or openness. In reality it is pretty much the same as the JLC 1000 hours seal, a marketing slogan based on some in-house testing with a cool logo that they tell us means quality. So I wonder who pushed PP ove... 

Only time will tell...............

 
 By: Topcat30093 : March 31st, 2009-20:33
What the "Watch World" and its customers will make of this announcement. It should come as no surprice to any of us, as it had been rumoured for so long. I remember being told about it early last year.

Indeed

 
 By: Dje : April 4th, 2009-14:47
Hi, We've been waiting for a year, so no surprise! Wait and see! Cheers Dje

Good questions Aaron

 
 By: Dje : April 4th, 2009-14:46
Hi Aaron, Is it Cartier, or Frederic Constant, or Vacheron Constantin, or Chopard, or Roger Dubuis? Any other on the list? Cheers Dje This message has been edited by Dje on 2009-04-04 14:48:04

The key for PP is the Purity of the Comite.....

 
 By: MTF : March 31st, 2009-20:57
dje, All the reasons are rational and acceptable for the implementation of the PP seal. Some of the push may have come from Chopard L.U.C. with the Qualite Fleurier seal. LUC also uses the Geneva seal for some of it's production but found that it was not ... 

Very Well Said

 
 By: patrickau : April 1st, 2009-00:08
MTF, You should be in the Comite!!! Pat

I second that! nt

 
 By: Dje : April 4th, 2009-14:55
nt

Thank you for sharing Melvyn

 
 By: Dje : April 4th, 2009-14:55
Hi Melvyn, Interesting points you share. The Chopard explanation may be quite true indeed and the Patek Philippe decision played quite gentlemanly! Let's wait about this PuristS' spirit in this Comite! Can't wait to know more! Cheers Dje

Nice write up, Jerome

 
 By: amanico : March 31st, 2009-22:27
Now we'll see if it will be enough to avoid the problems of reliability seen on the recent watches... To say all, I think that the 2d reason is more evident than the first one. When a brand like PP comunnicates from decades about " EXCELLENCE ", it doesn'... 

Of course there is marketing

 
 By: Dje : April 4th, 2009-15:00
Hi Nicolas, Of course there is marketing! It is just efficient because this marketing is based on a true commitment and experience of quality. Regarding quality problems, I suppose Patek Philippe has some like the others, but do we have any evidence to sa... 

If

 
 By: patrickau : April 1st, 2009-00:00
If the PP seal is used: 1. For all PP watches and 2. Only exclusively for PP watches than it has no difference from Patek Philippe "brand" or "logo". The seal would just mean that all watches are built to internal factory standards. IMHO, no such need for...  

If you know the historical spirit of Rolls-Royce....

 
 By: Dje : April 4th, 2009-15:13
Hi, If you know the historical spirit of Rolls-Royce, for instance "Perfection is made of small things but perfection is no small thing", or "take the best you can find and make it even better", you'll realize that indeed Patek Philippe is today very clos... 

Well said.... but....

 
 By: happy_wis : April 1st, 2009-08:55
the reason the "stamping" of the PP seal is better executed than the Geneva Seal is because, I believe, the PP seal is NOT STAMPED on the plate. In fact, it should be made by something like Computer Numerical Controlled Machine (http://en.wikipedia.org/wi... 

Agree...but

 
 By: patrickau : April 1st, 2009-19:41
I agree with you that: 1. Hand execution is more desirable than machining. 2. The Geneva Seal design is more beautiful. Looks more old-school flag-like. More details. The PP seal looks like the logo some mega brands have. 3. Collectors will love to have t... 

RE: "One thing for sure, the "stamping" of the PP seal on the watch is definitely better "

 
 By: WatchFan1 : April 1st, 2009-15:03
Pat, you example shows without any doubt one of the most perfect PP seals they could find for the PP seal marketing brochure. OTOH the Geneva seal you found has sure has a lot to be desired for I guess I lucked out.... 2 of 3 Geneva seals on my PP watches...  

I must say

 
 By: patrickau : April 1st, 2009-19:11
I must say that the seals found on your watches are very impressive. The photo I got was from the 3919 review by John: http://www.tp178.com/jd/patek-3919/index.html Quote: Ironically, the Geneva Seal was poorly executed, with ill-defined edges and an unev... 

No!

 
 By: Dje : April 4th, 2009-15:10
Hi Patrick, AFAIK the Patek Philippe Seal is going to be reserved for Patek Philippe watches. The Seal is different from the brand through the Comite that is supposed to warranty that the quality is there. Plus you should not forget that a Seal means comm... 

This is great news.

 
 By: KCLQMULKU : April 1st, 2009-01:07
There are numerous criticisms mentioned including the possibility of bias, elitism, advertising/marketing hype, et al. But how can science, technology and passion move forward without one group within choosing to take that very step into the unknown. I be... 

Rolls Royce is by far the best marque in motoring and

 
 By: sadris : April 1st, 2009-03:11
Patek Philippe is by far the best marque in watches!!! well IMHO....I personally like the new PP seal....gets to the point don't you think? R's Sid

Excellent point, thank you!

 
 By: Dje : April 4th, 2009-15:20
Hi, What we all want is excellence in quality, advances in horology! That's quite nice to see Patek Philippe take the lead! Cheers Dje

pp seal

 
 By: jgarcia570 : April 1st, 2009-07:38
hi, i think it has been a bold action from pp to change the seal to pp seal and leave the geneva seal. i tthink every patek watch has sort of a pp seal sinse is made with the best materials available and also under impacable precision. i have always been ... 

i just felt more "secure" if you wish with the geneva seal.

 
 By: Dje : April 4th, 2009-15:28
Hi, You wrote "I just felt more "secure" if you wish with the Geneva Seal." That's the whole point for the need for a new seal! A Seal is a warranty, a commitment! If they don't follow the Geneva Seal anymore, they need another one! Regarding the old watc... 

The PP Seal includes a timekeeping standard.

 
 By: mkvc : April 1st, 2009-14:53
If I understand it correctly, that standard is a rigorous one. I consider that meaningful, although other than that I tend to think the whole exercise is being carried out for the purposes of preventing other Geneva Seal manufacturers from profiting by th... 

no need for a new seal

 
 By: af : April 1st, 2009-17:09
I share the sentiment that there's really no need for a new seal. Actually, PP should stand behind their products and the PP signature on the dial / movement should be sufficient to guarantee the quality of their products. I am worried that they are now d... 

Don't worry

 
 By: Dje : April 4th, 2009-15:47
Hi, Apparently the new Patek Philippe Seal definition of service will concern all watches coming back for service, particularly for those being less than 30 years old! Hopefully you'll get better sevice than up to now! Cheers Dje

PP need not use the seal to show its commitment.

 
 By: ling5hk : April 2nd, 2009-15:35
It is just like you do not need to hang your PhD certificate on your neck to show to the world that you are a learned person. What we need from PP is their fine execution on their watches, good and speedy after sale service and no nonsense on marketing th... 

It depends on your customers....

 
 By: Dje : April 4th, 2009-15:49
Hi, You don't show your Phd certificate to your old customers, but new customers need something to trust you! Patek Philippe has decided to show its Seal as a commitment! Cheers Dje

People buy PP because of PP either blindly or otherwise

 
 By: ling5hk : April 5th, 2009-16:40
Hi, New customers will not open the case and confirm PP seal before purchase. Regards Ling

Indeed but....

 
 By: Dje : April 8th, 2009-03:21
Hi, Of course new customers will not open the case but…… …….you have more and more watches with see-through back! J …….trust PP to communicate about the seal, what they are already doing with a new advertising campaign!... 

"Subtle" coincidence ?

 
 By: NJ : April 3rd, 2009-06:15
The juxtaposition of the two "P's" was of course first seen on the rotor of the calibre 12-600. Whether it was a coincidence at the time (as now with the new "seal) remains a question but the similarity with the famous Rolls Royce emblem is unquestionable...  

?

 
 By: Dje : April 4th, 2009-15:50
Hi John, Could you develop? Cheers Dje

Nice tree John, but you're forgetting the forest behind IMVHO!

 
 By: Dje : April 8th, 2009-03:13
Hi John, I understand your point John, but I think that the creation of the Patek Philippe Seal is a way to conceptualize and summarize the way Patek Philippe wants to create, produce, sell and service watches. It is not going to revolutionize the PP orga... 

it's just another logo

 
 By: ei8htohms : April 9th, 2009-21:53
Hi Dje, I hope that you are right and that this is a legitimate effort by Patek to recommit themselves to the highest quality standards, but I just can't see it in that light. Companies redefine themselves all the time by clarifying or rewriting their mis... 

"Patek Philippe no longer meets Geneva Seal standards ?"

 
 By: NJ : April 25th, 2009-14:38
...was the initial response my spouse had upon hearing the news about Patek's self coronation. Perhaps some others will come to a similar conclusion.