angler7
15
Appreciate the feedback Imran!
As advised, I am doing all I can to determine the provenance of the piece.
Taking the plunge
By: angler7 : May 20th, 2011-19:45
Owning a Patek has been at best a pipe dream for much of my adult life. Every so often I would peer at a window display, pick up a catalogue or visit this fine forum to learn what I could about the designs or calibers. The complicated timepieces are a mar...
Thanks Oliver!
By: angler7 : May 21st, 2011-06:53
Interesting observation on the reference. I was going by the vendor's advert and pictures of Ref. 425, which closely approximate my watch. Will definitely hunt down a copy of the Reference Guide for details on Ref. 1560. The archive extract will tell all....
Hmm . . not so sure
By: angler7 : May 22nd, 2011-12:26
Thanks Oliver for the scan! It certainly looks like my watch, particularly considering the frame and angle of the lugs, though I notice a few differences. The pictured watch seems more square than rectangular, both on initial impression and by reference t...
Hi Angler7.
By: watch-guy.com : May 20th, 2011-23:41
As you say it is very difficult to comment on pics only. A few thought. 1. Dial looks original -possibly cleaned but should have enamelled letter. Sub seconds looks like original enamelling though 2. Crystal is replaced. Should be facetted. 3. Get an extr...
Thanks Julian!
By: angler7 : May 21st, 2011-00:30
Your contributions definitely have helped me in my search and I appreciate the feedback. I see what you are saying about the faceted crystal as I look at your lovely piece. I also prefer how your crown is more subtle than mine. Fact is that I have purchas...
So true
By: angler7 : May 22nd, 2011-10:48
It is like alternating between a rock and an eggshell. My IWC is stainless steel, water resistant to depths of 180 feet, covered by a grade 9 hardness sapphire glass and double cased (with the inner one made of soft iron to protect against magnetic fields...
Appraisal
By: angler7 : May 27th, 2011-11:33
Just received the appraisal from the vendor who had also submitted the request to PP for an archive extract. Good news. He has appraised my watch at precisely the value that I negotiated, which is 32% below the selling vendor's listed internet price and 1...
Archive Extract
By: angler7 : June 14th, 2011-16:42
Received PP's Extract from the Archives today, so mystery solved. My Patek is neither a Ref. 425 as marketed nor a Ref. 1560 as surmised by Oliver. It is a Ref. 1468. I have attached a copy of the extract with the last four digits for each of the movement...