The RQ in 40 mm

 By: ChristianDK : January 23rd, 2021-13:29
(For Jay)
I could only try the 40 mm in RG. It is definitely my preference even if most people ordered the 42 mm case.

This message has been edited by India Whiskey Charlie on 2021-01-23 14:33:57 This message has been edited by India Whiskey Charlie on 2021-01-23 14:34:04 This message has been edited by India Whiskey Charlie on 2021-01-23 14:34:17

Stunning in both metals. Amazing pictures

 By: emcquillan : January 23rd, 2021-13:56
No message body

Such a spectacular piece!

 By: Chronometer (aka yacomino) : January 23rd, 2021-14:07
No message body

Yes, 40 mm all the way.

 By: India Whiskey Charlie : January 23rd, 2021-14:09
No message body

I wish they still made the 38mm case :-(

 By: David Allen : January 23rd, 2021-16:21
No message body

It looks great, on your wrist.

 By: Jay (Eire) : January 23rd, 2021-15:27
Funnily enough you are the second person to show me a 40mm RQ today, a friend just visited a boutique earlier this week.  

When the world returns to normal there will be a lot of catch up for me in terms of seeing watches for the first time in the metal, the RQ being one.  QP being another.  

Thanks Christian. 

I hope it works size wise. It’s a fascinating watch and I think it offers something else than the original.

 By: ChristianDK : January 24th, 2021-07:16
It doesn’t have the slim elegant profile of the R though. It is packed with a crazy movement and for that I find it very reasonably sized.

So good

 By: cmmnsens : January 23rd, 2021-19:59
No message body

40mm is 👌

 By: cwatch : January 23rd, 2021-20:16
I’m waiting on a 40mm RQ.

I also prefer the 40, here’s my platinum version

 By: baldywatchman : January 23rd, 2021-23:23

So beautiful and amazing 🤩

 By: Watchonthewrist : January 24th, 2021-01:28
No message body

What size is your wrist? Comparing this 40mm and the HM3 wristshot you posted and just wondering.

 By: Jay (Eire) : January 24th, 2021-06:19
No message body

Simply superb!

 By: ChristianDK : January 24th, 2021-07:17
No message body

The 40mm looks amazing and would be the way to go for me as well

 By: holdemchamp1225 : January 24th, 2021-00:49
No message body

40mm would definitely be my preference too! :-)

 By: sham1 : January 24th, 2021-00:50
Not withstanding my smaller wrist, the movement will fill up the case back a lot better.  

Gorgeous FPJ

 By: Watchonthewrist : January 24th, 2021-01:27
Love it

I went with the 42mm

 By: : January 25th, 2021-16:18
Honestly your wrist seems big enough to have the 42mm but it is all personal preference...Jim

The watch was designed for the 42 case and FP was wearing the 42 when I saw him in august.

 By: ChristianDK : January 26th, 2021-10:09
You are right, I could easily pull off 42. It’s just more a preference thing for me. My preference is 38-40 mm.

Thank you for the information Christian

 By: : January 29th, 2021-15:42
It makes me feel like I made a good decision going with the 42 since the watch was designed for that case. I’m sure it will fit me fine and I never plan on selling it so I’m one happy guy if I ever get it smile. Have a wonderful weekend… Jim

Love this congrats 40 looks outstanding!

 By: igibliss : January 26th, 2021-20:06
No message body