

Speaking of your LUC, which one was it? Any pictures? ππ»


KMII,
I am checking with Chopard because that is an unusual looking watch.
The reference number does not match the reported model of watch.
The numerals are different from the ones I have seen before.
The logo font is from a different production era than the Roman numerals' font and shape of hands.
The crucial question is whether it has a closed or see-through case back.
Finally, unless it was a special order, I do not know of a grand feu enamel dial for any L.U.C XP watch.
The photo is unclear if a third hand is overlapping the hour hand. If it is a central seconds hand, it is not an L.U.C XP or XPS.
Conversely, L.U.C 1937 with central seconds hand has a date display.
If there are only two hands, then one is a dauphine shape and the other is a distorted dauphine fusee shape; which are also incongruous.....
Regards,
MTF