The RM10 is a beautiful watch, I always think that pics never seem to do it any justice, the way the light plays on the blue glass face, the view of the movement etc. I love holding it up & looking through it from the back, seeing the date dial etc, .sadly something that you cannot do with the 11, the 10 has a far more beautiful movement to loose yourself in. I have one in white gold, and it seems to suit the watch perfectly with the glinting edges etc.
I always love to see a central sweep second hand too, and what a lovely hand it is on the 10.
Only thing I have never been keen on is the winder, I think it looks a bit numb on this watch, a bit out of line with its classic elegance, its a sort of nut with a rubber ring round it, would much prefer a more elegant design, something like the one found on the 21 for example...but a small criticism, overall I agree 100% the 10 is a classic, beautiful watch.

But very nice, and suits you well Mein Freund!
Tschuss
Stephen
tonneau shape itself is nothing new, how Richard interpreted it was. The case construction and case shape is unique and as recognisable as the Royal Oak.
The aesthetics of the movements are also unique and the rotor is still the only variable geometry form.
In the long term, I think the RM series will generally be considered classics, and among them, the RM010.
Andrew H