As I collect mainly vintage I would NEVER sacrifice my collection for only one watch!
It took me decades to find all the "treasures" of my collection (not meant from the sum in $$) -
behind most of these watches stands a story...
I could sacrifice maybe a third or at the most half of my collection but I would not depart from the "hard core"
regards
erich
hey .!! firstly we are a WATCH NUTS ,which means we LOVE Watchezzzzz ;0))))))))))
to Answer your Question ?? i don't think i can live with Only One.!! i tell you why:
i believe that No Matter How MUCH YOU LOVE your Grail Watch ,IT'S NICE TO MISS IT every once in a while and to miss it you gonna have to wear something ELSE.. this my Friend is the Ultimate High/Pleasure you could have when you strap your Grail Watch on your Wrist again.!! ;0))))
Cheers
T
My grails have certainly changed through thru the passage of time and what was once desired would not find its way into my collection now.I now don't believe in grails as that would mean the end of the road and there are far too many pieces that I like to pinpoint the "one".As they say "happinese is the road".
I agree that if a piece is super hyped and people are willing to pay crazy money for it,the value becomes distorted and it becomes an investment rather than something you would enjoy wearing.Freeing yourself of the burden and reaping the rewards which will enable you to go on the hunt again is justifiable.
cheers
fernando
1- You cannot have only one watch. Need at least two for dress watches to alternate, plus a beater, in addition to the grail
2- Once you have acquired the "grail", most likely you will start searching for the next "grail" on your list. We are never satisfied with just "one grail"
3- No one is ever satisfied with only one watch. Just impossible JMHO and obsevation.
Cheers, Frederick
in order to buy my UN Freak i sold 225 watches which left me, at the time, with only 12. i had spent years gathering 3 seperate collections. military watches, Omega's and Tuning forks. it was a huge sacrifice, but i did well and managed to buy several other pieces.
i dont know if i'd do it again as my collection is a bit more personal now. the 1964 pieces are ones that i dont see myself ever selling. they seem to be the main focus at the moment as i can pick up good pieces for little money due to the market conditions.
interesting question
best
graham


And I have done so in the past - no regret. I had too many watches back then anyway.
But now the quantity is multiplying before I realize - I am still pursuing quality, but not necessarily with sacrificing quantity. Meaning, I am finding more and more (relatively speaking) affordable watches offer superior quality (read: Seiko, for example). There are other simple high quality watches which is not necessarily high end price, also those long discontinued but it was/is praised for its quality, etc.
So, all in all, the number of my watches is growing (almost every week?) but I am confident that I have not compromised much about the quality. And the bottom line is I am getting happier with my line-up today.
Best,
Ken
Happy holiday to you all and your family!
Wow Ken, you must be very successful here in Tokyo!
I envy you!
Tschuss
Stephen