




but in this case I prefer the dial side and the reversabilty does not enhance the appeal for me.
Thanks for the revelation FX.
F
I understand why the reverso was designed to be reversed but I really don't understand why this watch does.
Why would anyone want to view the non-interesting side where you can't see the gracefull movement of the tourbillon and you can't even tell the time....?
By the looks of it, it apprears he did. Very cool
I think it is just another way of standing out. IMO with any watch you will always look at the dial side 100 x more than the movement side because of when it is on the wrist. With the mvmnt side so beautiful now you can stare at that when you wear it as much as you will the dial side. Very cool

... I admit. Even I do sometimes want to wear the reverse, for example, Datograph for its beautiful movement. But this one... yes, beautifully finished movement... but not that much to stare for more than 30 sec. Impressive creativity of Mr. AP, but a bit overdone, IMHO.... His creation is always interesting and I look forward to the next one.
Thanks for sharing, FX!
Ken