Comments:
The Alfred 40 !
40 mm is a nice move, UJ should consider this for all line ups...
there is a tad increase in price though which I don’t understand why - in a way the case is existing - still a compelling offer imho !
But the key, there were few who went with 42mm LE - a bit painful
there is a tad increase in price though which I don’t understand why - in a way the case is existing - still a compelling offer imho !
But the key, there were few who went with 42mm LE - a bit painful
Now it is here... Yes, very nice version. 40 mm is top for that kind of watch. [nt]
No message body
No matter how much weight I put on
the wrist size stays the same Mahesh! 
I know the P4 movement is 32mm in diameter but I think if they really wanted to, a 38mm or 39mm case would have been possible. In fact, since they are continuing to make the 42mm variant, it might have been a better idea to have introduced a 38 or 39mm variant so that there is a suitable difference between the two variants. Just me trying to campaign for the impossible!!
I know the P4 movement is 32mm in diameter but I think if they really wanted to, a 38mm or 39mm case would have been possible. In fact, since they are continuing to make the 42mm variant, it might have been a better idea to have introduced a 38 or 39mm variant so that there is a suitable difference between the two variants. Just me trying to campaign for the impossible!!
i tried the 42 - it was quite satisfying
& the movement really fills the case.
it is not a svelte watch by any means, you can't compare with the swiss watch pedigree...rather it exudes more with the anglo-saxon vibe.
I figure the price increase is due to the 40 mm version coming with a folding buckle.
Also wonder how the folding buckle would compare vs the standard pin buckle as far as wearing comfort is concerned.