1989
Winston introduces a collection of watches,
"The Ultimate Timepiece".
1994
As a result of his experimentations with rare
metals, Ronald Winston creates "Galatea", a
unique watch made of solid rhodium, of the
platinum group metal.
1994
The Biretrograde Perpetual Calendar is
introduced, positioning the House of Harry
Winston as an innovator in the esteemed Swiss
tradition of complicated horology.
1996
Ronald Winston mounts an exhibition in the
private Imperial apartments in Beijing's
Forbidden City, the first event of its kind ever
authorized by the Chinese government and the
Palace Museum.
1997
The Harry Winston Gallery at the Smithsonian
Institution is opened with the Hope Diamond as
its centerpiece. Harry Winston is the only
jeweler to have a museum gallery in its name.
1998
The era of Max Busser begins.
2001
Harry Winston introduces Opus 1, a resonance
chronometer by Francois-Paul Journe, which
makes headlines for its unprecedented
technology and innovation as an Haute
Horlogerie project.
Opus continues annually.
Z series and special ultimate timepieces appear
occasionally.
Excenters emerge.
2001
Max Busser quote:
"A weakness of the company? Some would say that we are not easy to find. Be it for a Harry Winston piece of jewelry or a timepiece, because we are, and want to remain, very exclusive.
The Harry Winston haute joaillerie is all hand-crafted in New York, and available exclusively in our 5 salons across the world: New York, Beverly Hills, Paris, Tokyo and Osaka. The timepieces on the other hand are 100% crafted in Switzerland and most of the parts in Geneva itself, where our Timepiece headquarters are located. The first timepiece was created in 1989, and was for many years only available in our salons. Recently we decided to extend the distribution of timepieces to select independent watch retail partners. There are today 65 across the world."
2002 to 2007
ThePuristS.com creates and currently maintains the
live documentation of the horological information on the
significant watches made by Harry Winston. Eg Opus and the Z series.
The company Harry Winston has a website which is a commercial advertisorial
site.
2006 to today
Max Busser leaves to create MBF.
The saga continues...will MBF carry the torch of the Opus?
In my personal analysis, yes.
Will the company of Harry Winston fully realise the potential
of the artist and the ultimate high concept in the short term? No.
Has Opus 7 left us cold? Yes. The parallel between the Opus series and MBF will
always be on the TOP of the collectors mind.
At the very peak of the momentum of making Opus, which is much a platform for the AHCI and all independants,
even that of Journe and Richard Mille, Max Busser is still carrying the Opus torch.
This torch is a two edged blade. Cutting both ways, to incredible sucess as in creating
a new boundary, such as MBF1 and MBF2.
But also great failure, in simple collapse into financial ruin, such as all artists face.
Harry Winston is the stronger and mightier financially.
It has the ability to lure more talent.
But it has much more baggage, and weight to loose.
Max Busser is small. He is able to maneover.
At the level of art, the connoiseur does not buy brands.
. More in line with somethign for the "rest of us". Dear asg,
Again, I thank you for the critical points you have made. Immediately, just an hour back, I took a jog thru the cemetery a couple of miles from my place. It was 630am...cool, quiet.
The beauty of these cemeteries, and I really love these places, lie for me in their unique ability to make me sit back, think, reflect..and when I leave...I know that I will always be back....eventually.
Most of all, having dealt with death for over the last 25 years ( this august ), as a large part of my work in medicine, I have a weighted view of "things" and values.
Your post made me think. It was one of the BEST posts I have recieved as a reply. I am not a masochist. I like honesty, like yours.
I have to defend a few points.
(1)"Personally, Bernard, I think its very wrong of you, as an impartial moderator to stand on your soap box and preach the praises of MBF while putting down HW. "
This soap box is only mine for the timebeing, it can be, and will be taken, eventually by someone else. I try my best, most times, to honor it. It was given to me by Dr Thomas Mao, HWRT, Max Busser and several people who I have not met.
You are correct, I have "preached" MBF1 and Max's good work. I must be more careful here, thanks. I was, still am, very honest about my opinion. It was what has allowed me to rise in my career, both in the military, and in the corporate world, to where I am today. It had also resulted in my "fall" out of the corporate world, into forming my own company years back.
I did not however "put down" HWRT. In fact, in the whole post, I highlighted the history of their achievements. Only TWO points, the opus 7, did I give an a minus and feedback to the short term direction...negative.
(2)Just because you, personally have announced that you will receive a MBF watch, doesnt mean and/or give you the authority to start making personal, and somewhat derogatory statements about the HW watch brand without fact to support your claims.
I do not announce my acqusitions of watches. Unless...no one else steps up to do so. Or the entire forum will be filled with my posts...horrors. For MBF1, Opus5, and selected pieces that I bought, I hope that I have decided wisely, to announce..chuckles..my purchase. Why?
Some may feel it is to show off my wealth. I can't defend that one. It could actually be true. Anyway, I think all who know me, or have met me, will not think that one. Have you seen the car I drive..sheese...it sucks. Or my office..it is in a hard neighborhood.
I do write, post, announce, a few selected watches that I bought..because I wanted to share my expereince with it. The good parts, as well as bad. Err..mostly good. I bought a few watches that are really not so good...and I refrained from writting about them. Now, I am actually thinking that I should.
(3)Opus 7 left who cold? You? So what? That's your personal view and it shouldnt be stated like its "fact" of the history of the HW brand.
Opus 7 leaving me, or any buyer who had the means to buy it, cold or hot....is very important. I want to meet, share, discuss with all Opus buyers. The ones who contemplated buying it, like me, why they did or did not buy it.
The Opus 7, being such an important product, leaves any one + or - feelings, I would encourage them to speak up. It helps the whole industry.
The Opus 7 leaving me cold IS a fact. It can't be otherwise. It was my opinion. If my own opinions, written by me, were not fact...hmmm...it would be strange.
However, whether it leaves others cold...that I do not know.
In no way does Opus 7 leave any "history of the brand". It leaves a footprint.
BTW, I have to reveal that I do have a certain acess to data, and data is not always fact, but for hat it is worth at the point in time, data has a certain value. From data available, I do make statements meant to inform the community, the best I can,
without hurting the company or people. This is one of many responsibilities of a moderator.
(4)You state that will HW succede in the short term - your statement is "No". Tell that to my retailer who can't keep the men's watches in stock. Honestly, as a long time member of this community, and someone who has admired you and your beliefs and "opinions", I think you are way off base here and you are using your "authority" position to further your personal beliefs of the moment.
This point, I have to stand firm. I seriously believe that the short term direction that the new owners of HWRT is NOT AT ALL in the direction of Haute Horology. Short term. Long term..I don't know.
As to keeping watches in stock..and good sales...to me, different issue. Market movements, complex beyond the scope of my reply.
I do however feel happy that you have admired my posts, so I am obligated to help you understand the market dynamics and how I process data from the company end. We can continue, but maybe later.
I don't wish to have an authority position. I wish to have a position of expressing opinions. MOST of all...you MUST trust me that I mean it when I say again, that your chastising me is APPRECIATED by me. This is what makes a forum LIVE. Others may not look upon it the same way..but I like to recive BOTH negative and positive replies to what I write. I learn. I like honesty. Thanks.
I have strong personal beliefs. I wish to further them. BUT not for selfish reasons. I want people to see a little more into an industry that is right now, on the verge of elevating itself FROM mere luxury goods TO a higher platfrom....let us try to do that.
The short term goal of the new team of HWRT..is making it's luxury platform stronger, and making its prevous strong art platform weaker. I like Hamdi, he is "for" the art platfrom. But he is unable to exercise his vision at the moment.
(5)This post shouldn't be in the HW forum - it should be in the Independant area - and you should seriously consider if maybe as a moderator and long time purist about making such inflamatory comments without facts. When I would make personal comments about UN or other brands a few years ago, I would have my head handed to me. I personally would expect more from a moderator and collector like yourself.
Well..after you have read my replies above. 1 to 4. This post does belong.
I want to honor Max's many years here. He shaped the company. He created it.
If it inflames..well..sad.
Personal. Yes. My full identity is always revealed in all my posts. So I have to live with what I write, I have to meet people from HWRT and from other companies. I have to answer to ALL of what I write.
I do get my head handed to me. Face to face. It has happened in the past.
I have learned. Got better as a result.
No regrets.
I live life to the fullest. With my own standards of intregrity.
Thanks again!
Cheers from sunny Singapore.


I think you will like it.
I must honor the faith you trusted me with.
Hope it answers some questions.


what will be the reaction from the community at large? I am sure Bernard speaks his heart. Still, for someone 'new' to HW, the message will certainly be confusing.