WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Vacheron Constantin

Thank you, Robin.....

 
 By: WHL : April 1st, 2014-08:51
I am very interested to see what your second Vacheron Constantin will be. smile

Bill

Hard to tell

 
 By: Mark in Paris : March 31st, 2014-01:32
but I always loved the fantastic elegance and pureness of the 1955. If you add the thinness of the movement and its beauty, it's a great watch at every level.

But I understand the final choice is tough... and the temptation is great!

Cheers, Mark

I think the 1955 is great....

 
 By: WHL : April 1st, 2014-08:53
and the execution and finish is fantastic. The only reason it isn't in the running for me is that I just wouldn't wear it that much, as much as I like it.

Bill

Well.....

 
 By: 4Js : March 31st, 2014-04:23
Having the 1921, Toledo 1952, and Nicolas' selection of th chrono in my watch box, I have admired the CR. I got to see the 1955 regularly via our Respo.  I do love that 1003 movement.  But I really fell for the piece unique in the CR in that blue enamel.  I even asked if they would special build another version using the blue enamel, but they said no.  So, if I had to choose today, I will gladly take a platinum CR. I think a different, snappy shoes would make it unique?

Best,

Joe

Blue strap?

 
 By: WHL : April 1st, 2014-08:59
Hi Joe, I like your thinking on the platinum CR. Too bad you couldn't convince them to make another blue dial for you.

Bill

Suffice it to say...

 
 By: respo : March 31st, 2014-12:34

...I would not kick any of these out of bed.  ;-)

I actually wrote a longish reply to this post, but somehow it got lost in the series of tubes and wires we call the Internet.  :-( 

So, I will merely say that the American 1921 is THE ONE for me.  And the Historiques line of watches is exactly my cup of tea.

And a few pictures just because:












Thanks for this thread, Mr. Moderator, on one of my favorite topics.

Best,

respo

I like that CR on your wrist.....

 
 By: WHL : April 1st, 2014-09:01
but I have the felling that it will not be your next VC. I'm most interested in seeing how you get a calibre 1400 into your collection: the Contemporaine, or perhaps the Aronde 1954?

Bill

I took that photo, but sadly it is not my wrist

 
 By: respo : April 1st, 2014-09:37

But it does look good, doesn't it? 

You and I are both looking forward to seeing how a cal. 1400 ends up in my collection.  Time will tell. 

Best,

respo

'72 Prestige de la France for me [nt]

 
 By: secretlife : March 31st, 2014-19:25
No message body

I need to get some photos of the 1972 Prestige....

 
 By: WHL : April 1st, 2014-09:02
But until then ,we'll have to live with the masthead that shows respo modeling it.

Bill

Ha, ha! That's funny, Bill.

 
 By: respo : April 1st, 2014-11:33

"...we'll have to live with the masthead that shows respo modeling it."

But here is respo unoriginally modeling the original:




Best,

respo

I really prefer their "Collection Historique"

 
 By: Tick Talk : April 1st, 2014-06:39
but no surprise there ;-)


1945 ad

1945 ad


Why am I not surprised by this? :-)

 
 By: WHL : April 1st, 2014-09:04
The purist in me agrees with you, but when it comes to daily wear, I typically find myself going with modern watches (this will be different when my XXL comes back).

Bill

My first impression of all the Historiques is very positive

 
 By: dshao1 : April 1st, 2014-07:08
That should be no surprise for me either (hi Dean) smile

But if I get to the point where I want to purchase a watch, I usually try to find the original if I can. (i.e, the CR and the 1968)

But there are some Historiques that I think are better than their originals:

1. I love the cal 1003/3 with 18k gold bridges and plates used in the 1955
2. I love the dial and prefer the modern cal 2460 movement used in the Toledo 1951
3. I love the herringbone design and RG hands on the grey dial of the 1972 (which I also include as a Historiques).

So these are my 3 favorite from the Historiques Collection.

BR, Dan

Thanks, Dan.....

 
 By: WHL : April 1st, 2014-09:07
the larger size of some models in the Historiques collection compared with the originals certainly makes them more appealing to a modern audience.

Bill

I agree Bill. I'm just glad that I have scrawny wrists...

 
 By: dshao1 : April 1st, 2014-22:03
and can take advantage of the vintage market. ;-) BR, Dan

Dan,mi did get a wrist shot at the boutique

 
 By: 4Js : April 1st, 2014-10:47
Gray dial





And the boutique edition





Both  are beauties

Joe

They look really sharp Joe!

 
 By: dshao1 : April 1st, 2014-21:58
And they fit your wrist quite well. Due to the case shape, I think a wider (not necessarily larger) wrist is needed for the 1972 to fit properly and feel good. BR, Dan

I like your thinking on this, Dan

 
 By: respo : April 1st, 2014-11:39

...and, in general, I am in agreement with you.

Here are a couple of shots I took when you were in the room at SIHH:









There is a 40-year gap between these two siblings.

Best,

respo 

Just keep both eyes on your 1972!

 
 By: dshao1 : April 1st, 2014-23:44
I like the shaped, cal 1050 with gyromax, free spring balance inside ;-)

I also envy the cufflinks!  :-0

BR, Dan 

Tough Choice

 
 By: bsbg : April 1st, 2014-12:51
If I had to pick one, it would, likely be the CR. The 1921 has really grown on me since I first saw it and asked "why the twisted dial?" To the point it seems like more watches should have that orientation since we spend so much time at keyboards and driving. 
Load More Comments >>