Following up on Bill's entertaining "Pair of pairs" thread the other day, here is a pair that has been on my mind way too much and for way too long.
The question is simple: Which one?

(The photo on the left is courtesy of our esteemed Moderator, and it is one of the best photos of the gray Patrimony I have seen; the one on the right is not my wrist, but it is my photo. Both photos were taken on nice sunny days.)
Using the new VC nomenclature, it is a Patrimony v. Traditionelle smack-down.
I have a feeling I know what the consensus is going to be, but I thought I would ask the Forum anyway.
I hope you enjoy looking at these side-by-side as much as I do, torturous as it is.
Cheers,
respo
Right, Bill? ;-D
I asked this question actually not so much to get help with making my personal decision, but just to see what the current opinions are on these two watches. The Patrimony with the slate dial has been out now since 2010 while the gray Traditionelle has been with us for a much shorter time, although a decent enough interval for initial enthusiasm to have died down if it is has at all.
As I suspected, while we have not had a ton of responses here, the Traditionelle is beating out the Patrimony by about 2 to 1. Your point, Bill, about the change of the metal affecting one's preference for the model is well made. I prefer the Patrimony over the Traditionelle, if only slightly, in every metal and dial color except when it comes to the platinum and gray combination -- and there I get stuck between the two gray dials, unable to come down on a clear preference.
I hope others will chime in. 4Js has not participated, for instance, but I suspect that is because he is tired of discussing this exact topic endlessly with me. ;-)
Best,
respo


...but I am sure VC will make enough for both of us! ;-)
Best,
respo
small seconds sub-dial it give life to the watch.
Cheers
Francois from Down Under
a gorgeous timepiece. I just saw the Platinum slate grey version last week, and I saw two VC honchos (one a pretty woman VC executive) wearing the PG version. The only downside is that there is no sapphire caseback, but think you will have platinum resting on your wrist.
...and that has crossed my mind since collecting the movements is as important to me as the watches themselves. Thanks for this observation and recommendation.
Best
respo
not make sense to own two watches with the same movement. At least that's what I feel, though many would disagree.
And the Patrimony Contemporaine is a beautiful timepiece. The 'regular' version in PG and also the boutique edition with Black Dial are both breathtaking.
Another piece you could consider is the Patrimony Contemporaine automatic with date (At 6 o clock), either in PG, or if you can find it, Black Dial boutique edition. The latter is a rare bird, and these have sapphire caseback. Putting the date at 6 is a nice touch and gives good balance.
...as the Talking Heads song goes.
I see your point, but I also would consider it perfectly sensible to collect every version of the Vacheron Constantin Historiques Chronograph. The movement is so lovely, as is the watch, and I find every metal and dial combination compelling. I feel like a complete set of those chronographs (about 5 main variants, I think) would make a wonderful collection all by itself. I know, it does not make sense. ;-)
There is a collector here among us who owns at least four variants of the Patrimony (manual wind, no date), and odd as it may seem, I totally get that collecting craziness. It makes perfect sense to me.
As for the Patrimony automatic with date at 6 o'clock, that is a gorgeous model. I really want that caliber in some VC watch one day. But when it comes to the Patrimony, I really love the purity of the dial without the date. That and I also want a cal. 1400 in my small collection because it is such a beautiful manual wind movement.
Best,
respo
Traditionelle in Platinum to go with my PG version. I agree that sometimes it does not have to make sense.
VC did make the Contemporaine automatic without date but discontinued it two-three years ago. I think the reason is not enough capacity and they need that movement for the Metier D Arts pieces etc.
I never thought about the short-lived ref. 86180 you mention being discontinued due to capacity reasons, as you say, with VC needing the movements (cal. 2460) for the Metier D Arts and other pieces. I always thought that the model was discontinued due to lack of popularity.
For me, the 86180 is, or rather was, a very interesting alternative to the 81180: no date, so retaining the pure dial, a sweep seconds hand enlivening the dial in the way that the seconds subdial does this for the Traditionelle Small Seconds, and a very nice automatic movement viewable from the caseback.
In fact, maybe a bespoke Cabinotiers piece is a solution: an 86180 in platinum with the slate gray dial. Perfection!
Thanks for your continued comments.
Best,
respo
reasons. I always felt the version without date looked better than the version with date.
Yes, a special order the way you have described would be a splendid timepiece.
Choosing between these two watches would be difficult. And depending on one's collection and resources, I could see someone getting both. That won't be me, unfortunately. :-( Tough choices must be made!
Best regards,
respo