


For me, the Métiers d’Art Fabuleux Ornements stole the show. These really have to be seen and seen under a loupe to be fully appreciated. Photos don't do it. This set demonstrates how some watches transcend being timekeepers and become works of art.
I was left torn between the two skeleton tourbillons -- both are magnificent, and I left them with perhaps the slightest preference for the Malte. But I prefer the solid dial 14-Day Tourby over the solid dial Malte Tourby.
I for one very much like the power reserve on the dial of the 14-day, as I think it adds a balance to the tourbillon display at the bottom of the dial, and the PR is such a major component of the entire concept, I would hate to have seen it, for instance, relegated to the back of the watch. Now, my top preference among the new tourbillons is the Collection Excellence Platine 14-Day Patrimony Traditionelle Tourbillon. That's the ONE! I guess I prefer a platinum dial over a skeleton. ;-) Well, a boy can dream can't he?
The skeletonization work on the new Métiers d'Art Mécaniques Ajourées pieces is breathtaking. Skeletonization has long been an art at VC second to none. I think they have simply upped their game in this area -- and it is not as if they had to. I am so glad that they did not go the direction that other brands have gone in recent years to try for a very modern almost minimalistic approach to skeletonization. What they have done here looks like nothing else out there. It remains very true to their heritage while taking the art to another level.
Finally, the Malte Small Seconds received a facelift so soon after its initial introduction, and I am sure that the revisions will help to make this watch more popular. I will be in the minority, I guess, when I say that I prefer the original dial. The starkness of the dial without the minute track is just so striking and allows the focus to remain solely on the beautiful polished, beveled hour markers and the gorgeous dial. Oh, well, just my opinion. I remain agnostic on the decision to open the back up with a view onto the cal. 4400. It is great to have a view of this lovely movement, but it belies the fact that we are seeing most, but not all, of the round movement through the tonneau-shaped crystal. Still, I think this was probably a smart decision by the VC designers and no doubt reflected what they heard in the marketplace.
Here is a snapshot of my "travel kit" for SIHH:

Thank you Vacheron Constantin for a superb 2014 Collection and for being the most generous and gracious of hosts.
Best regards,
respo
What was cool and something I learned
was that all of the new VC in-house movements that have come out in the 21st
century were conceived and designed with skeletonization in mind. That is some nice foresight.
This allows for the open-work to be done in layers, creating much more of a 3-D
look. It is not the same as the cal 1003 and cal 1120 that VC has skeletonized
in the past, and for the MDA Fabuleux Ornements. Based on your great eye, you
seemed to have noticed this on your own.
VC says it took over 500 hours to design how the skeletonization would be done (at least on the 14-day Tourbillon,
and 50 extra hours of labor to do the actual skeletonizing (on all of the new open-worked movements).
Best of the VC show for me would be the Open-Work 14-Day Tourbillon. I realized that I didn't notice the off-centered dial with all the open-work beauty to feast my eyes upon.


I love the skeletonized cal 4400, and
actually think the diamonds on the bezel are discrete enough for me to feel
comfortable wearing it,



