Patek Philippe

…. these maybe just as beautiful ?!  

my heart is on the right. One is "obviously" beautyfull and veeeery classic, the other one shows some "complicated spice" and some oddity. The latter is not for beginners ...

Just my 2-cent

Best,
Oliver

What a dream to possess this duo!

No message body

For us less advanced collectors, model numbers on these?  Thanks in advance.

Great pair!

.

Both are very nice. Wear them often 

5050 is also a beauty.

think the 3448G is beautiful out the the two watches shown, nothing any good in the perpetual calendar since 3450 was discontinued in 1985. With the Perpetual Calendar Chronographs after the 1518, 2499 I would say 5020 are beautiful.  Any of the modern watches that are any good I think the Tourbillon Minute Repeaters, and the water resistant split second chronograph models such as the 5004P, 5204P, 5951P, and 5950A.

collectors are not that into it anymore. 

...where is the leap year indicator in the 3448??

Cheers,

Gordon

So in order to set a patek 3448 correctly, the best bet would be to visit PP svc center for the adjustment.

I do recall a prototype 3448 with a leap leap display on the moonphase, but never was put into production.

You will find this on Branberry book.

 AN IMPORTANT AND UNIQUE YELLOW GOLD AUTOMATIC PERPETUAL CALENDAR WRISTWATCH WITH LEAP YEAR INDICATION INSTEAD OF MOON-PHASES 1970-1975 REF 3448J MVT 1119137 CASE 325493

 http://www.sothebys.com/en/auctions/ecatalogue/2008/important-watches-ge0804/lot.214.html

The 3448 is perfect in my opinion!  Well Balanced dial, elegant and without flaw.  The case proportion is nice and the thickness of the watch adds a substance and chunkiness that works for me.

No message body

Anyone of the 4 for me will do ;-)

Never saw 4 of them together ! I am very impressed.

4 very nice variations of a gorgeous watch.

Best,

Mike

Not that 5050 is not great, but 3448 has always been my Grail watch.

Huge congrats, it is even niver in WG ;-)

Best,

Mike

You got great taste!