i never really had a like for the offshore models , i wear the 5711 everyday and as long as your prepared to live with a few scratches and marks on it(as its prone to accumulating them) you'll be fine. i also swim with it occasionally as its rated to 120m. Just get the resistance tested every year as a precaution.
regards
darma
Thank you all, guys! Personally i do understand that we are all biased here and being pro-Patek it’s difficult to judge between two great watches.
But, aesthetically I do agree that Nau looks much sophisticated and refined compared to ROO. The main issue I have concerns about is the durability of the case and water resistance. My Moscow AD says that 120m resistance for Patek means that you can only wash your hands and walk under the rain wearing this watch. Bit strange for me given the 120m water resistance.
Plus, how 324 caliber feels itself in sporty watch? I don’t have a problem with 324 in 5127 calatrava, it’s a formal watch. But how this caliber lives in sporty watch?
I don’t care about the scratches – it’s the same if we would be concerned about facial wrinkles and gray hair.
i do appreciate your input and thoughts!
have a nice day, friends!
ed
too often for Hi-End watch, isnt it?
but be carefull with the "H" word
.....I know what I am talking about.
Cheers
Francois
I thought about that but my perception of Aquanaut is "light version of Nautilus"...
But, to be fair, I have little love for AP ROOs!
AP 15202 ST would be a tougher comparison versus the 5711 given the shared Genta genetics.
