Comments:
I have difficulty choosing between these two. I prefer the complication of Annual Calendar but can't resist the elegant of white gold.
Please help.
Now we have one 5726 two 5712G and one 5712/1A thanks
If I had to choose between the 5712a and the 5726 it would be the 5712a as well, however in saying this my next nautilus would be the 5980a if this was on the table, love the thickness and sportiness of this piece. As nautilus in Latin means blue it would be the blue dial please.
Haere ra
( Maori for goodbye)
Darma
I believe that the comparison was made between 5712G and 5726A because they appear to be the same -- both are in leather strap and have same case appearance although one is in white gold (5712) and the other in SS (5726).
My vote basically goes to the 5712G for the following reasons:
1. Slimmer case
2. Uniqueness of the dial
3. Practicality of the complication
Having said that, the 5726A is a great watch. It's so happen that I preferred the 5205G not because of the metal but more on the uniqueness of the two-toned dial, the pierced lug, the concave bezel, and the calendar aperture location, all of which IMHO can become a collection Item features 20 to 30 years from now.
Thank you for the respond
I have difficulty choosing between these two. I prefer the complication of Annual Calendar but can't resist the elegant of white gold.
Please help.
5712 A.
But I am french, I always decide on what is not part of the choice.
Best,
Nicolas
Thanks for the reply any other thought ? Please share
Now we have one 5726 two 5712G and one 5712/1A thanks
One more 5712 because
Nautilus is a sporting watch a gold if the wrong material for such a watch. Furthermore, the annual calendar version is quite thick while 5712 is slim, elegant and pleasant to wear.
I have noticed that lots of Nautilus Annual Calendars are sold 2nd hand. Some grey dealers are also selling this watch with well discounted prices. To me it tells that there are many buyers who were not happy in the end with this watch.
I wanted to get the annual calendar version and went to the Boutique wearing my old Nautilus on my wrist. Comparing the two, I noticed that the new Nautilus was not even close to the slimness of the old one. So my choice was 3712 - but it wasn't easy to find an unused one, neither was it cheap.
My recommendation is 5712 in steel.
Best, Kari
Since Nicholas has restarted the french revolution
If I had to choose between the 5712a and the 5726 it would be the 5712a as well, however in saying this my next nautilus would be the 5980a if this was on the table, love the thickness and sportiness of this piece. As nautilus in Latin means blue it would be the blue dial please.
Haere ra
( Maori for goodbye)
Darma
Thanks Randy for raising this to a vote
I believe that the comparison was made between 5712G and 5726A because they appear to be the same -- both are in leather strap and have same case appearance although one is in white gold (5712) and the other in SS (5726).
My vote basically goes to the 5712G for the following reasons:
1. Slimmer case
2. Uniqueness of the dial
3. Practicality of the complication
Having said that, the 5726A is a great watch. It's so happen that I preferred the 5205G not because of the metal but more on the uniqueness of the two-toned dial, the pierced lug, the concave bezel, and the calendar aperture location, all of which IMHO can become a collection Item features 20 to 30 years from now.
Steel nautilus all the way
I think the nautilus in SS is the most attractive among the nautilus line (of course this is my personal opinion) 
Will take the 5726A.
Will take the 5726A.
Tough call
Even though I have a 5712G I would suggest getting a 5712/1a for its versatility. I also like the 3/4 rotor movement in the 5712, and prefer the dial to the 5726.
My choice would be for........
The 5726A.
Nearly two years ago it was either this piece or the 5205G.
In the end it was the 5205 that came back with me
Nearly two years ago it was either this piece or the 5205G.
In the end it was the 5205 that came back with me
Finally make my choice guess what
Neither 5712G nor 5726A and not even 57121A
It's 5712R that won my heart most when I put it on my wrist. it sit perfectly on my wrist and I just prefer the weight of gold.
I must said 5726 is really cool and stunning n of course comfortable too but I stay with topcat30093 that I will pick 5205G probably for annual calendar for my next Patek.
Since the movement of 5712 is more unique. Thanks again everyone here for sharing.
It's 5712R that won my heart most when I put it on my wrist. it sit perfectly on my wrist and I just prefer the weight of gold.
I must said 5726 is really cool and stunning n of course comfortable too but I stay with topcat30093 that I will pick 5205G probably for annual calendar for my next Patek.
Since the movement of 5712 is more unique. Thanks again everyone here for sharing.
Congrats on a great watch !
And Topcat and I look forward to welcoming you to the 5205 club
Congratulations.
Trying it on always is the best. You can take everyone's opinion, and we all have one , but when you see it up close, try it on, get the feel for weight and comfort, that is the true test.
, but when you see it up close, try it on, get the feel for weight and comfort, that is the true test. You've got to like what you purchase.
Aloha,
Bob
5712R
I get more good comments on my 5712R then any of my PPs 5970 5270 5078 5079etc. etc.