Comments:
First Patek - Ref. 96
Hello,
This is my first post on the forum. I am currently seeking my first Patek, a clean vintage 96, and have found what I believe to be the one I'm going to purchase. I was wondering if anyone knew what the difference between those with the Geneva seal and those without was. Is there a certain date that this was introduced? I've seen some that are double signed, ones with one, and none at all. I am looking to keep this piece long term and am not that concerned with its worth or resale, I just want to make sure that I am paying a fair price for it. Does anyone see anything that I should be concerned with on this movement? Thanks!
This is my first post on the forum. I am currently seeking my first Patek, a clean vintage 96, and have found what I believe to be the one I'm going to purchase. I was wondering if anyone knew what the difference between those with the Geneva seal and those without was. Is there a certain date that this was introduced? I've seen some that are double signed, ones with one, and none at all. I am looking to keep this piece long term and am not that concerned with its worth or resale, I just want to make sure that I am paying a fair price for it. Does anyone see anything that I should be concerned with on this movement? Thanks!
Nice movement. Looks like a cal 12-120. I would get an
extract from the archives to make sure the case and movement go together.
Here is mine
Julian
Here is mine
Julian
From what I can see...
Hi,
from what I can see in the picture - it is OK, it is a cal. 12-120
Do not bother about the Geneva seal... the movement is perfect with and without this seal...
not all the movements had the seal but equaly good finish and performance.
I personaly would not mind.
best
erich
LooksSuper
The movement and case (little that can be seen of this) seem to be in fine condition. I'd take the plunge on this watch if the dial were fine. Ref 96, a true classic and one of the most beautiful watches you can ever own.
Rishad
Rishad