It wears very nicely. It's the ideal case size for me, highly legible dial, clean lines. Lugs 'hug' the wrist slightly, thin side profile so it disappears under the cuff easily, just the right 'heft'.
I feel the same, there's just something about it. I like that the crown guards also talk, it their own way, to the design enthusiasm of the 5711, but in a much more restrained and formal way.
The screw down crown is a great feature that makes the watch more versatile. I can't guarantee what the weather will be like when I'm out and about, but I can have some confidence that it will survive an unexpected downpour and not have to keep it covered in a panic as I have in the past with snap on vintage watches.
The 5107 has a flatter bezel and more of it. The 5127 feels a bit taller visually due to the arch on the bezel, and looks like it has a wider dial or at least wider dial opening. Both beautiful but I am drawn to the 5107. Aesthetically it feels more balanced.
I see..thank you for the clarification. I too am one who appreciates the small details that can possibly be a deal breaker for me. Well, enjoy your beauty in good health!
The 5107 and 5127 are very similar, and of course both are the best modern Calatravas ever made, but the 5107 has a weak point in that the clasp is a little tricky to use,
By: anaroku : September 9th, 2024-04:56
especially when worn on a bracelet. But with a leather strap, it's no problem at all. And I especially like this clean and universal G type.
This was in the window of Tourneau in, like, 2005-2006? I tried it on with extreme trepidation. It was like shaking hands with a king. Very nervous. I wondered if I could ever bring myself to buy such a thing. Well, I never got one, but it started the dream machine, which produced many realities. I don’t love Patek in general but there a few models that make me very… irrational! This is one. Congrats.