Comments:
Reflection or no Reflection
Which angle do you like on this 7234R?
Took the watch back to room and can’t help taking this Lume shot
Took the watch back to room and can’t help taking this Lume shot
oh my!!
I looked closer and saw Tiffany and Co.
This is a super rare piece.
No reflection shot is nicer.
Thanks cookies…good to hear. I also prefer the no reflection photo showing the dial 👌🏻🙏🏻
They all demonstrate the beauty of this wonderful watch. Where at in the best of health
Appreciate your kind words Doc! I’m staying as healthy as I can to enjoy the hobby 💪🏻
Pic #1 (and why not, #3) for me, which show all the beauty of this T dial (and lume)! ;-) Cheers.
Great photos
Curious your decision to put it on a deployant clasp? Did you size up to 16 mm or stick with 14 mm? I have an 18x16 mm strap on mine right now. Have debated ordering the 16 mm version of the buckle that comes with the watch.
I always prefer deployant over buckle …
Fear of dropping the watch. I stick to 14mm since there are limited options with croc strap. I see the original calf strap is 16mm so I think 18/16 may work too.
Definitely agree with the with the use of a deploying clasp
Beautiful pictures, Raymond! I like the first one!
Good to know, Justin. I agree sometimes these reflection shots give some peaceful feelings.
Deployant clasp
Nice! Didn’t know 5524 or your 7234 came in a deployant clasp. Did you also change the strap to Alligator? Like the deployant on this reference. Looks more formal with that…👍
It didn’t come as standard so it’s extra order…
Yes the Alligator strap totally changes this watch to look formal and we like it, so it is different from the casual 5522A.
You can do so with your 5524G as well.
Haha…
Nice! I’m the other way and am looking into a Nato on the 5524 instead…haha. But, at least it’s good to know I have options if I needed to dress it up. Thanks!
Thank you very much for the support. I agree this is a nice and complicated watch, useful function.
This is a killer watch...
...but I still have a problem with the 1 - - 4 - - 7, etc. I don't know why, but it's not intuitive. Especially the odd and then even number sequence. PP manages to use the 1 - 3 - 5, etc. sequence on its other watches. Just my .02.
Now that you mentioned the date...hmmm, my only explanation is if it is 1-3-5...
it will be very crowded. The prints are quite good size, using 1-4-7 only needs 11, but if using 1-3-5, you need 16 and shrink the size. may not be pleasing to some or match to the fonts of the main dial.
Yes, as a graphic designer I understand the problem...
...but it isn't a problem on Patek PCs... Either way, if I had the funds I would still be tempted as it's a great-looking watch...