Comments:
Lange & Sohne Double or Triple Split?
Double Split:
Triple:
Triple:
I still have to post my review... Will do this month.
Best,
Nicolas
Well, the only one I did wear is the double split... [nt]
It was heavy, rain imposing but mesmerizing.
I would say, currently still great value for money.
Never seen the triple in the flesh...
But I could live with the double 😉
Cheers,
Dirk
The Triple Split seems more logical to me. It would be useful for timing up to 24 hours as one is not likely to forget the 12 hour hand has gone around once already. [nt]
No message body
Yes, it is a marvel. The thing is to know if it will be a one shot, or not. [nt]
No message body
Haven't Seen the Triple irl, but judging from Pictures and tech sheet....
I'd Go with the triple split. It's got the same diameter and is only .3 mm thicker than the double split, which is very little for a watch that's already above 15mm. The White gold case should make it less heavy than a Platinum one, which helps wearability for such a large watch. Also, I'm Not a big fan of roman numerals, which is the reason why I prefer the dial of the triple to the (Platinum) Double. Judgment can of course be very different on the wrist.
I prefer the dial of the Triple Split as I find it better balanced... [nt]
No message body
Both are huge on the wrist but I like the dial more on the Triple Split as well as the technical marvel that it is 🔥🔥
Settling for a Double Split is not a bad thing in any case 😜
There is only one thing wrong with the double split
Triple split’s existence. I’ve long considered the double split my grail watch, but knowing that the triple split exists has dampened that feeling.
From a value for money perspective, a DS can be had for less than half the money for a TS (if you can find one) but is it half the watch? I don’t think so.
Like Ferrari...the 8-cylinder is awesome, but then there's that pesky V-12 : ) [nt]
No message body
Triple is The Ultimate
please make a name for this (was it PP that name Rattrapante for double/catchup?)
Yes, but no. It is not interesting to do the same. Not in JLC spirit. [nt]
No message body