Comments:

Lange & Sohne Double or Triple Split?

 
 By: amanico : June 1st, 2020-04:06
Double Split: 



Triple:



I still have to post my review... Will do this month. 

Best,

Nicolas

Well, the only one I did wear is the double split... [nt]

 
 By: dedestexhes : June 1st, 2020-04:56
It was heavy, rain imposing but mesmerizing.
I would say, currently still great value for money.
Never seen the triple in the flesh...

But I could live with the double 😉

Cheers,
Dirk

Same here. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : June 1st, 2020-09:27
No message body

The Triple Split seems more logical to me. It would be useful for timing up to 24 hours as one is not likely to forget the 12 hour hand has gone around once already. [nt]

 
 By: mpg13 : June 1st, 2020-05:23
No message body

Yes, it is a marvel. The thing is to know if it will be a one shot, or not. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : June 1st, 2020-09:28
No message body

Haven't Seen the Triple irl, but judging from Pictures and tech sheet....

 
 By: nafetS : June 1st, 2020-05:50
I'd Go with the triple split. It's got the same diameter and is only .3 mm thicker than the double split, which is very little for a watch that's already above 15mm. The White gold case should make it less heavy than a Platinum one, which helps wearability for such a large watch. Also, I'm Not a big fan of roman numerals, which is the reason why I prefer the dial of the triple to the (Platinum) Double. Judgment can of course be very different on the wrist.

I prefer the dial of the Triple Split as I find it better balanced... [nt]

 
 By: amanico : June 1st, 2020-09:28
No message body

Both are huge on the wrist but I like the dial more on the Triple Split as well as the technical marvel that it is 🔥🔥

 
 By: holdemchamp1225 : June 1st, 2020-06:08
Settling for a Double Split is not a bad thing in any case 😜

Same for me. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : June 1st, 2020-09:28
No message body

Great minds think alike Gros 😉 [nt]

 
 By: holdemchamp1225 : June 1st, 2020-09:40
No message body

Wesh. ;) [nt]

 
 By: amanico : June 1st, 2020-09:51
No message body

There is only one thing wrong with the double split

 
 By: mihalis : June 1st, 2020-11:36
Triple split’s existence. I’ve long considered the double split my grail watch, but knowing that the triple split exists has dampened that feeling. 
From a value for money perspective, a DS can be had for less than half the money for a TS (if you can find one) but is it half the watch? I don’t think so. 

I love the way you see things, here. I am in total agreement. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : June 1st, 2020-11:57
No message body

Like Ferrari...the 8-cylinder is awesome, but then there's that pesky V-12 : ) [nt]

 
 By: mdg : June 2nd, 2020-10:37
No message body

Nice comparison! [nt]

 
 By: amanico : June 2nd, 2020-10:38
No message body

Triple is The Ultimate

 
 By: Gelato Monster : June 1st, 2020-22:44
please make a name for this (was it PP that name Rattrapante for double/catchup?)

Definitely the new king. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : June 1st, 2020-23:04
No message body

we need sexy naming like rattrapante [nt]

 
 By: Gelato Monster : June 1st, 2020-23:08
No message body

Triple Rattrapante? [nt]

 
 By: amanico : June 1st, 2020-23:19
No message body

Duometre Triple Rattrapante! 😉 [nt]

 
 By: cory : June 3rd, 2020-00:29
That Triple Split is impressive.

Yes, but no. It is not interesting to do the same. Not in JLC spirit. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : June 3rd, 2020-00:33
No message body

Of course, in JLC spirit... as always. [nt]

 
 By: cory : June 3rd, 2020-00:35
No message body

;) [nt]

 
 By: amanico : June 3rd, 2020-02:28
No message body