grigo
3441
Yep
Great year as far as I am concerned.
Rather than an association I suggest that we create an "amicale', in this manner we can be more picky about the choice of members.
Best regards,
George
Yep
By: grigo : December 12th, 2010-07:21
Great year as far as I am concerned. Rather than an association I suggest that we create an "amicale', in this manner we can be more picky about the choice of members. Best regards, George...
Agreed
By: grigo : December 12th, 2010-08:09
Far from me to want to exclude a Purist. What a horrible thought. However, you could conceive that people that were not born in 1964 and that are not Purists, but who admire people that combined these two caracter traits would want to join. In an associat...
Exactly what I meant
By: grigo : December 12th, 2010-16:23
Everybody wants to belong, guess it was unavoidable given the description of the association. We won't be able to call it PuristSPro though as the name is already taken. Maybe the age requirement is discriminatory and should be dropped. Best regards, Geor...
how about 40, 52, 64,...
By: G99 : December 13th, 2010-14:53
how about 40, 52, 64, 76, 88 all the years of the dragon. i know at least 1 member from '52, lots from '64, bound to be 1 or 2 from '76 and my son is from '88. with his speedy he could be a purist if he had the time. just another idea...
Lovely photos
By: aroma : December 12th, 2010-07:42
Hi, I'd just love to know how you photographed the first watch - did you use a diffuser (white box) with an external light source? I'd just love to get mine like that but using daylight gives too many reflections.