grumio
313
Very strange indeed.
The movement in the photos definitely appears to be a cal 420, but missing some of the sweep seconds parts.
But 2nd and 3rd the photos clearly show correctors on the dial side to set the day/month/phase of the moon, which were never present on a cal 420.
As the first photo appears to have all the necessary calendar parts showing, I'd be really curious to see what's under the dial on this one.
Possibilities I can see are
Someone has gone to quite some lengths to fake the photos, or
Someone has heroically modified a 420 movment to add the calendar parts. Hard to see, as the 420 and 381 share no parts in common at all.
I notice also that the regulator appears to be non omega.
Whatever it is, it does seem very unlikely to have left the factory that way.
grumio
This message has been edited by grumio on 2012-03-04 14:52:55