WatchProSite|Market|Digest
WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Omega

They did indeed. And re-fitting 321 would of course have been top but I guess this is as good as it can get.

 

Cheers, HSTE

  login to reply
 
22 Comments view entire thread 

I guess I did not have these pics on here before: 2915-1 vs. 2017 tribute/heritage 60 years Speedy.

 
By: HSTE : January 25th, 2018-12:47
I like ´em both: one takes it more easily, the other can bear a bit more at its young age. Cheers, HSTE ...  

The dial and the hands on the right one are insanely good looking.....

 
By: Clueless_Collector : January 25th, 2018-13:43
oh wait, they are from the new 60th anniversary release Omega did a great job for people like me who prefers modern/new. Rgds Raymond

Thanks for the superb pics

 
By: Prodyutb : January 25th, 2018-16:35
These are great pictures to hold on to, for those of us who have only the anniversary model to look at!

Thanks for sharing

 
By: arcadelt : January 25th, 2018-17:54
Just goes to show how amazingly well Omega did with the 60th Anniversary Speedmaster. Now, if only they had installed a Cal 321 as the engine...

A few observations/ questions

 
By: TS1987 : January 25th, 2018-19:44
So the new one has a naiad crown, but the original didn't? Is it just me or are the engravings on the new one's bezel a bit exaggerated compared to the original? I would trade my '83 Speedy for either of those, if the opportunity arose elsewhere, that's a... 

I try to answer these questions: ....

 
By: HSTE : January 26th, 2018-00:20
Some of the 2915 (and also later series) had Naiad crowns, and some did not. It is, to my knowledge, not entirely established which ones / on what criteria they would be fitted with Naiad or not, one theory is as simple as the possibility that Omega used ...