hoipolloi
446
Nothing's wrong with it.
As I can see, the number 8 is correct and I have a letter R in front of it.
Here is what I have on my 561 chronometer, housed in a 168005, 18k solid gold case.
Has me stumped
By: mondodec : January 30th, 2010-18:11
The serial number on your watch is where it should be, as serials on 50x movements were near the barrel bridge. And I dont think you'll find another number under the dial. I initially thought that maybe, somehow, the 1 may have been left off, but an 18 m...
Goliath variations
By: DeGeus : February 1st, 2010-15:38
Funny you should mention that Graham, over the years I' ve made that observation as well. Here is an early one (27'''' Lépine 8D) with the brandname "Brandt"... another one with "Omega" - 17J - adjusted... yet again with simply "Omega".... and finally a "...
very interesting Ben. i...
By: G99 : February 4th, 2010-02:29
very interesting Ben. i dont think i have pics of mine as it was years ago, but i find one i'll post it. no markings whatsoever on movement, but with Omega on the dial. lovely loud slow tick. it would have made the perfect alarm clock if there had been an...