Chrono seamaster ref 176.001 : where does the truth lie ?
Dear fellow Omega - purists, After having contacted him following a post on his friend building up an extensive (to say the least) Omega collection, Ruckdee advised me to post on this forum regarding a specific question for which I have not found, so far,...
Nice mystery
Karmin, First of all, the 176.001 and 0001 represents the same watch. Omega, added one zero when they changed their systems (late 60's or early 70's). Allow me to add more mystery to your quest with my 3c: Searching on the vintage Omega information site (...
i think its absolutely right as it is and it looks very very good to me
the only thing i would disagree with Nilo on is the outer bezel. i dont think your watch has anything missing, i just dont think it had any inner/outer bezel of any sort unlike the square ish model which has an inner tachymetre bezel. my reasons for think...
Looking on the black book
All 176.001/0001 on the Omega black book carries an internal bezel. Cheers...
there you go then Nilo,...
there you go then Nilo, i'm wrong again. story of my life best G...
When I first looked at your watch ... I didn't think I haven't seen it before.
But when nilomis mentioned the possibility of an "internal bezel", I realized I was wrong and that I had to refresh my memory again. Here are a few photographs reproduced in good faith and without permission from the black book. If this is a violation of ...
So do I want to go there!!....
the watch looks fantastic, and I think that an internal tachy dial never existed on YOUR watch, as there's no room from the photos (i.e. nothing missing). I love the nice little 24 hr indicator on the 9 o'clock dial, very nice touch. superb watch. Tony
From a reference to another
Thanks a lot for information you posted and for invaluable help it provides. I will try to replace the current crystal by an internal bezel that comes from a ref 176.007 + any crystal that would fit, to see if they are interchangeable, and I'll let you kn...