smorrisonmd1
101
Thanks. That's why I ask the experts:). It is......
Dec 02, 2012,15:57 PM
en route for my approval and I believe is solid gold so may be a 14393. I was just guessing at the movement. Will post pics when it arrives!
Comments:
view entire thread
Sorry, here is pic:
By: smorrisonmd1 : December 2nd, 2012-09:39
Maybe it is just me, but I don't recall seeing one of these date models with the large arrowheads, as opposed to the stick markers. Are these unusual? Rare? ...
Well they did do a ........
By: aroma : December 2nd, 2012-10:03
2943 and a 2954 with a date complication and I assume that given the era they came from, with the arrowhead markers as well. Some of the early 561 series had arrowhead markers and date Cheers Andrew
Not a 564
By: mondodec : December 2nd, 2012-15:34
The last genuine model to have arrowhead markers was the cal 561 case 14902 - the 14902 gold capped examples are quite uncommon. Both the 14381 and 14393 had versions with arrowhead markers, but if the movement is a cal 564 then the watch has either had t...
2943...
By: kyle L : December 2nd, 2012-16:44
Shouldn't it have a cal. 504? Here's another example: and my 14393: ...
I was under the impression that . . .
By: Dr No : December 2nd, 2012-21:33
. . . the spelling of 'chronometre' changed to 'chronometer' within the production span of the cal 504, in either '58 or '59. Wouldn't a watch with this dial be accordingly fitted, Desmond? Intrigued, Art
re
By: mondodec : December 3rd, 2012-17:08
Yes that's the general range Art, although some French and Swiss Constellations were the exception. I suspect a redial as this configuration should be in a 2943, whereas in the 14393 version we see the absence of Officially Certified unless a factory repl...