ImranLondon
[PuristSPro Moderator]
6322
Thinner perhaps, but i still think its too thick and....
I think its great (as I am not a DNA die hard), that they have done this size, its going to be a great seller,
but I still think it too thick in proportion to its width
However, IF they make a manual cal.9000 thin case base version...that will be HOT
Best
Imran
SIHH 2012: Panerai PAM392 & PAM393 42mm Luminor Marina 1950 3 Days Automatics
Panerai released its first ever 42mm Luminors - the PAM392 in stainless steel ($7,800) & PAM393 in red gold ($25,900). PAM392 in stainless steel PAM393 in red gold I believe Panerai did this because they wanted to incorporate the in-house P.9000 movem...
Thickness?
These watches appear very thick. Are they any thinner than the 44mm versions? In my opinion, the 44mm are too thick already. Thanks.
Yes the new 42mm Luminors are thinner than the 44mm Luminors
Here's a comparison pic of a 42mm PAM392 (on left) with a 44mm Panerai on the right. Cheers, Anthony And here's a wrist shot of the PAM392 42mm Luminor ...
Thinner perhaps, but i still think its too thick and....
I think its great (as I am not a DNA die hard), that they have done this size, its going to be a great seller, but I still think it too thick in proportion to its width However, IF they make a manual cal.9000 thin case base version...that will be HOT Best...