MichaelC[AP Moderator]
21997
So does anyone think that "error" was intentional?
I'm just curious as to what everyone thinks about that. Hard to imagine Panerai could let this kind of misprint slip through.
Nonetheless, we have seen certain "oddities" of this nature from time to time. While it seems backwards that anyone should prefer the watch with the word spelled incorrectly, I would also keep it as is
Thanks for the post and enjoy your watches!
Great photos and write up...
By: dlee : November 2nd, 2013-13:17
I am also the recipient of the 399 with the "EEE". I was informed that only the very first batch came with the error +/- 20 pieces. Panerai was very accommodating in replacing the casebacks. it was to my understanding that we were supposed to ship the wat...
Maybe on the prototype...
By: teofft : November 12th, 2013-16:19
I've heard of prototype watches having deliberate variations to throw off counterfeiters, so I could see how it may have been intentional on promo pieces. But on a flagship model that's a special edition? I wonder if there is anyone from panerai lurking w...
PAM 399
By: Peter Lui : November 8th, 2013-22:30
Like you, I received my 399 along with the special box set (size of a coffee table if I may add) back in X'ams of 2012. To this day, I continue to wonder how on earth such mistake could take place. Given the PAM 399 was a SE with only 100 pieces, not to m...