scotthicks61
63
233 hands down
As others have said, manual wind is the collector's choice as value is far better in the future. Plus, the movement aesthetics compliment the watch well. I'd take either if the deal was right! Not big on date wheels for Panerai though. Maybe if it were more rugged I'd like it. Time only is a basic staple.
Thanks
Scott
the 233
I prefer the 233's thinner profile and it has more interesting movement. The added complications are also compelling, particularly given the nice GMT implementation. I also think the manual wind is more in keeping with the style of the watch. It's not rea...
The 233... that's why I sold my 312 [nt]
No message body This message has been edited by rhirsch1 on 2009-07-21 21:45:59
I prefer the PAM312 over the PAM233
because it costs less and doesn't have the linear power reserve display which I never really have warmed up to over these past years. If I had to buy one, it'll be the 312 for sure. - AT
both are nice but i'd pick the 312
2 different Watches that have different complications. i'm wondering why you didn't pick another GMT Model like the : 320 Vs 233.??! (in terms of almost the SIMILAR complications) Tony
I also have to go with the 233, if given the choice between
.....the two I would much prefer the GMT, 8-day, and manual wind features of the 233. Just my 2 cents
233 hands down
As others have said, manual wind is the collector's choice as value is far better in the future. Plus, the movement aesthetics compliment the watch well. I'd take either if the deal was right! Not big on date wheels for Panerai though. Maybe if it were mo...
The 312, plain beautyfull dial!
I also never liked the linear power reserve, not a panerai dial! alepos
for the 1950s spirit
The 312 is for sure very nice, but I prefer the 233 which does remind me of the 1950s... it is quite a unique style with the cristal saphyr's shape !