NJ_Mark
321
Steel Would Be A Welcome Addition to the Villeret Line
It certainly would be refreshing to see a steel villeret as an option. That is not to say that it should be applied broadly to the line but certain models in steel, offered in limited quantities, would not devalue the villeret brand in my opinion. The fact that the Rieussec was offered in steel was factored heavily in my decision to purchase one and in all honesty I would not have become a first time Montblanc owner if it was only offered in precious metal. Now wouldn't it be nice to add a steel villeret to complement my Riussec!!
If Patek can do it...
By: aaronm : August 6th, 2010-12:09
PP has demonstrated that a carefully curated collection of high-end steel pieces does not reduce the overall value of a product line, in fact the older simple Patek's in steel are far more valuable than the gold ones. I would say MB should make a steel pi...
On the subject
By: laif : August 10th, 2010-09:35
On the subject of "if" I think they should offer stainless steel models my answer is yes, they should. However I believe it needs to be done a proper manor, that is to say, a model such as a classic vintage style chronograph, using a dial taken from their...
The question is ...
By: AndrewD : August 7th, 2010-05:54
... does it devalue the watches in precious metals? I am not one of them, but I have heard people say that they would only buy watches made solely in precious metals. Any steel watch in the same range would turn them off the purchase. I wonder how prevale...
Thoughts...
By: nickd : August 7th, 2010-11:13
I sometimes think it's almost as though the watch companies are saying to themselves that they are enlightened, knowledgeable watch experts who understand and appreciate the intrinsic values of a fine movement, but that as the peasantry in the stores coul...
Yes but...
By: bigdave : August 8th, 2010-04:47
1. The Patek analogy doesn't really seem compelling to me. They make, at a guess, about 50 watches for every watch that Villeret makes, and, as such, have much more room to accommodate a variety of constituencies in their product line. 2. Many of the Vill...
Those are fair points...
By: bigdave : August 9th, 2010-15:01
... though I will say that the original JD collection nodded sufficiently toward historic designs that were originally executed in precious metal to leave a JD buyer's preference for steel back then more clearly seem a pricepoint-driven decision than a pa...
To Wear or Not to Wear?
By: MTF : August 8th, 2010-22:40
Each case material has it's own set of characteristics that detemines 'fitness for use'. Precious metal has it's place as has stainless steel..or...titanium...or Kevlar. If I wish to wear a more robust watch for daily use, I may look for steel cases. If I...
Agreed.
By: patrick_y : August 9th, 2010-09:42
The entire reason why steel watches would be considered for the Montblanc Villeret timepieces would be to allow for increased sales to a wider clientele. And in all honestly, I would consider acquiring a Montblanc Villeret in steel because I am just that ...
New Ideas of gold...
By: patrick_y : August 10th, 2010-16:10
Mike, in my opinion Philpro really brought out a PuristS-type question. Why would a PuristS member value the case material when we ultimately care about overall case design and the excellence of the movement? I think many PuristS members don't think of wa...
I beg to differ
By: mkt33 : August 10th, 2010-17:17
" I think many PuristS members don't think of watches as status symbols and probably not even as jewelry." Perhaps I'm too pessimistic but I think your description only applies to a small percentage of watch enthusiasts. Even amongst PuristS members, I th...
Old ideas of Gold...
By: bigdave : August 12th, 2010-05:10
I think that you are exactly right to discuss traditionalist values as a reason to prefer precious metal cases apart from status or jewelry. At least for me, a sense of tradition makes a gold watch much more important for a dress piece than for a technica...