amanico[JLC Moderator]
341689
Yes, you are right, I meant that the dial side shows the rotor through the openings of the dial, but here it is not present.
Oct 20, 2019,22:49 PM
You can see it here:
Sorry for not putting it well...
Comments:
view entire thread
Ps
By: Jurry : October 20th, 2019-05:40
Ps I with you a long way, I would hate to see my 1921 with a rotor, likewise I wouldn’t like my Harmony without a rotor
+1. [nt]
By: amanico : October 20th, 2019-07:52
Automatic is nice when it looks like a manual :)
By: eklektik : October 20th, 2019-09:31
Technically, have you got some exploded view of these movements showing the rotor? Is the axis held on both sides by jewels? That would help with the longevity and balance of the watch. Best É.
So discreet that it’s actually non-existent,
By: Boron : October 20th, 2019-18:02
I know JLC have made some excellent movements in their time, but this one must function via witchcraft, in the absence of its peripheral rotor.
That 950 is just ,Wow !
By: ZSHSZ : October 20th, 2019-20:24
Both from aesthetic and technical point . Thank you for sharing .