What a lovely pair!

Jan 12, 2021,03:58 AM
 

Both larger than the ultra-thin tribute models from 2011 onwards. I find it interesting that jlc keep experimenting with different case sizes across their time-only reversos. I guess it may have to do with the rather unique fit and wrist feel of reverso, and consequent need to cater to rather different wrist sizes. Nonetheless, the approach what is released in which size doesn't seem very systematic (or perhaps rather, I fail to recognise it) which may also create confusion for consumers, especially if buying online. I guess the old adage that a one should always try a particular Reverso model on the wrist before buying still applies.

How about your two models - do you easily transition between wearing each of the different sizes?

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Similar yet different

 
 By: Rick.On.Watches : January 10th, 2021-12:40
Both rose gold. Both limited editions of 100-pieces. But the grey dial version has a deployant clasp while the blue dial is pin buckle. Importantly, they are slightly different case sizes; grey 49.4 X 29.9 while the blue dial is 47.0 X 28.3. ...  

Interesting details!

 
 By: patrick_y : January 10th, 2021-12:46
I'm crazy about Reversos. They're so underappreciated.

An exquisite pair of Reversos 👏👍

 
 By: holdemchamp1225 : January 10th, 2021-14:53

beautiful collection

 
 By: Gelato Monster : January 10th, 2021-16:17

What a magnificent pair!

 
 By: sirdavid : January 10th, 2021-18:12

What a lovely pair!

 
 By: th.gr.ga : January 12th, 2021-03:58
Both larger than the ultra-thin tribute models from 2011 onwards. I find it interesting that jlc keep experimenting with different case sizes across their time-only reversos. I guess it may have to do with the rather unique fit and wrist feel of reverso, ...