amarelli
53
VS Ceramic
The material is nice, it feels slightly different than ceramic, but not by much. Though I suspect it will deal with hits better than ceramic.
That said I went for the earlier ceramic version, in spite of size, because the monochrome was a bit flat for me. Great design on the case, but the printing and lack of accents made it feel more like a prototype. That is all a matter of taste. Surely for the right person it would be a fit.
The movement needed adjustment at the start, but once IWC tuned it up, the watch has worked well. 
What do you think about the IWC Chronograph 41 Top Gun Ceratanium ?
I love the display on the dial and the black mate finish. But what about the movement? Is it a accurate and reliable movement? IWC never speaks about COSC or other certification. Regarding the material, does Ceratanium worth the price? Is it a real techno...
Time will tell if Ceratanium has any technological improvement
But my 3786 is still flawless after more than 15 years of action… this to me is a real deal of ceramic ...
VS Ceramic
The material is nice, it feels slightly different than ceramic, but not by much. Though I suspect it will deal with hits better than ceramic. That said I went for the earlier ceramic version, in spite of size, because the monochrome was a bit flat for me....
I think this is the only one they do a bracelet for
as in the only non-steel material, so added flexibility there. The bracelet looks nice but not so successful on other IWC they have paired it with ...
