A VERY Salient and pertinent point.
Moot argument and all.
The "inexpensive" quartz models that drive wheels and pinions, are many, and are stamped and made en masse. They are mounted with a myriad of other inexpensive creations...many of which are quite beautiful. Most are not relevant. Some are/were.
The Bulova Accutron (not quartz), and the Omega Mecaquartz and Patek Philippe's Quartz devices are beautiful creations which I covet, and have managed to acquire.
The ones I treasured are the Bulova Spaceviews and Omega's Seamaster Mecaquartz Marinechronometer wristwatch.
Now..the Devon Tread 1. I see this as a challenge to the creation of a hybrid timing delivery system that relies on belts and pulleys to create a new aesthetic, for the moment. However, it cannot be ruled out that an alternative to hands and LED displays may be useful in the future. I cannot speculate why, but I won't throw away any possibility.
Second, this watch is VERY like the Bulova Accutron, an American Machine, built the American way...which, being an Asian in Singapore, I am always grateful that the USA has saved my ass, the American way in the second World War, with their technology and vision.
I wish and hope that the USA will come back to watchmaking.
That's my 2 cents, anda half.
But in all humility, this is an electronically driven device and the timing regulators may still be quartz pulses, but the future of integrated software, with GPS, has been written for this watch. I am sure Devon is "ready".
This is NO ORDINARY SWATCH type imitator or piggy back quartz design with flashing LED lights. The quartz is there with relevance, but it is not an adaptation, but an evolution. And mechanical watchmaking is written all over the design.
This message has been edited by bernard cheong on 2010-08-24 06:39:58