Mark in Paris
[Purist]
10488
Feeling
Well, I imagine you've seen the LM1. They are both 44mm wide and the LM2 is a bit thicker from the figures I gathered.
But I didn't notice this growth in thickness during the try.
As with the LM1, the LM2 looks big, at least bigger that a normal watch of course (especially with its dome glass).
But, however, even though I didn't think about testing this criteria during the try, I remember it felt fine on the wrist, like with the LM1, and I didn't tell myself anything wrong about the weight for instance.
You should have a look at it when you can! (I'm sure you will ^^)
Cheers Oliver.
Some LM2 (MB&F) pics
Hi everyone, I've been trying this one for the first time since it was launched and I must say it looks great. I was wondering which one I would prefer between the LM1 and the LM2: the thing is I don't know yet... The LM1 is purer, has a huge balance whee...
"LM2 looks more technical"
Mark, I agree even when I haven´t seen it in the metal so far. But how did it feel on your wrist? To me it looks big ... Thanks! Oliver
Feeling
Well, I imagine you've seen the LM1. They are both 44mm wide and the LM2 is a bit thicker from the figures I gathered. But I didn't notice this growth in thickness during the try. As with the LM1, the LM2 looks big, at least bigger that a normal watch of ...
Hmmmm
I think the pictures are great but not sure they show the watch to full advantage because of the reflections.... on top of an already very busy dial. There are some marketing shots on the web that of course eliminate the reflections and I think you need t...