WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Horological Meandering

Yes I do, Andrew!

 

Let me begin by mentioning that have a chronic skin condition that often prevents me from wearing a watch with a leather strap on my accustomed wrist. Any creams could harm the leather. This in turn is a blessing in disguise, because I don't have to submit wrist shots to the Forum wink Then I switch to the other one until it too becomes inflamed, leaving time for the first to recover. That is like rotating fields for growing crops! My doctor is a general practictioner who suffers from the same ailment, so much so that he can no longer wear his wedding ring. His instruction "don't wear a watch" is of course impossible for me to follow. My suggestion to keep the ring but leave the wife never crossed my lips.


There may be one - the Haldimann H10 - that fits the bill, because it does not exist! Amery, I see that you forgot to put on a watch today. Not so, in fact I am wearing two H10s, one on either wrist! Until a small boy says, "but the Emperor is wearing nothing at all." (Hans-Christian Andersen)

That was the preamble for how I came to try out the "other" wrist.

There are indeed several watches that I wear interchangeably left and right, each with its own delights.

There are others  that actually feel more comfortable on the other one, or are more natural, legible - whatever. Did I forget enjoyable? Also the automatics get the full treatment.

There is another advantage for using the "active" wrist, the one for shaking hands, signing leases, raising drinks, gesticulating into the empty air - it becomes more noticeable and admired, also as a part of  "you", by persons that know absolutely nothing about watches. Then you are never at a loss for something to say. The confidence level rises.

The first impression is the  weight - really? Not  quite, I find that you suddenly become aware of the watch, in fact always when it is on "that" wrist. The strap will need to re-adjust to the fit. Then the feeling becomes perfectly natural.

Strangely, I find that the size, apart from the weight, does not play much of a role. As for the weight, it's on the right wrist for that. Enjoy your platinum!

I would never wear a Lange-1 on the left wrist, and in fact would not want one on the other. But the original FP Journe Resonance - and there, you have it!

Hide something here, reveal something there without having to pull back a sleeve to expose the entire watch. Or do you enjoy those games of Hide and Reveal?

My favorite everyday watch is a Sarpaneva Myrsky - with the crown on the left. Worn on the left, you can view pure watch without seeing the crown. And my right-handed friends (including myself) would never be tempted to "fiddle with it".  Worn on the right (with the crown on the left) it gains a sense of aerodynamic thrust.

Switching wrists can often be more satisfying than switching watches or straps as a whim or for an occasion.

The next question could be: wearing watches on the inside of the wrist, I would suggest 36mm or smaller on the less active hand. I spotted a photo of famed sci-fi writer Ray Bradbury doing exactly that.

How I will be wearing Vianney's latest? 

Don't be shy - just give it a try!

Cheers,
Amery






This message has been edited by amerix on 2013-05-12 09:16:46 This message has been edited by amerix on 2013-05-12 09:23:00 This message has been edited by amerix on 2013-05-12 09:30:44

  login to reply