Marcus Hanke[PuristSPro Moderator]
11297
No ...
The decision for the Typhoon was made by the then conservative government, violating the "rule" that Austria was "SAAB country" during all the years of the social democratic government. At the time of the bids, the Typhoon was clarly the better aircraft over the Gripen, that was offered at a far too high price by an over-confident SAAB leadership. However, the later reduction of the Typhoon force in numbers and equipment massively truncated its abilities. Since politics never was happy with the deal, all means, even legal ones were used to proof that EADS, the Typhoon manufacturer, had used illegal means to get the deal. Had this been confirmed, some people in the government would have considered returning the Typhoon and replacing it by .... nobody knows.
What has to be replaced urgently is the over-aged fleet of SAAB 105 trainers, in service since nearly fifty years, and the Alouette helicopter, workforce in mountain rescue and our (Red Cross SAR K-9 unit) regular training asset.
Marcus