Ubik
1871
More questions than answers
Jan 14, 2011,04:47 AM
This watch poses a lot of questions in my mind. I'm a bit pushed today but I can give you some quick thoughts.
The Venus 178 was Breitling's workhourse movement (Navitimer, etc), comparable to the Valjoux 72 and the Omega 321, it was primarily used by Breitling
throughout the Fifties and Sixties. It is rare for other manufacturers to use it and the examples I've seen tend to be from the Forties (Benrus Sky Chief)
and from the end of the Sixties (Universal Aero compax), I've seen it appear in LIP branded watches, but they are very rare.
What's interesting is that the Bridge is signed exactly like a Sixties Breitling, but with the word Clebar.
Photo credit
www.Navitimer.net t
The Fifties Breitling's were signed differently. This is my Navitimer from 1957.
Also notice that the regulator is different in the earlier movements. I'd have to do some more research but I'm guessing that the movement your showing is a later one, probably mid to late Sixties.
The other thing is that you don't seem to have an import code on the movement. This is the mark that would have identified the manufacturer as the watch came into the US. All movements would have had this from about the Forties until (I Ithink) somewhere in the mid-Sixties. Again this points to a late Sixties movement. Of course it could be that the watch was not brought into the US, but I'm guessing that all of this points to the movement being from the late Sixties.
Interestingly the import code for Zodiac and Clebar is the same -- KXF.
www.ranfft.de
As Jeff Stein has pointed out the case style would appear to be from a Fifties or Forties style of watch, the flat pushers were mostly phased out by the Sixties from most manufacturers, while the dial style, with the dished subdials seems very similar to the Breitling TopTime models of the Sixties.
Like I said this poses more questions than it answers, and I would need more time to be sure of my facts, but hopefully this has given you some leads for further research.
If you know a good watchmaker, it might be worth getting the dial off and having a look at the underside.