WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Horological Meandering

I would be interested to know ...

 


... how you, personally, would define "most complicated". Does it involve the number of parts at all? How do you go about defining a "complication"?

It is said that A.L. Breguet included every known horological complication in the Marie Antoinette pocket watch (Watch No. 160), but is there a watch today that could include all the currently known complications? It would be unwearable, I imagine, and perhaps better as a clock.

And while we are thinking about this topic, I have been pondering why manufactures persist in quoting the number of parts and number of jewels in their watch specifications. The days of this having much significance for the quality of the timepiece are long gone. In fact some watchmakers (F.P.Journe comes to mind) strive to simplify mechanisms and reduce the numbers of parts.

It all harks back to a time when more was consider better. There are unfortunately too many watches that follow that philosophy without much substance.

Andrew

  login to reply
💰169 Marketplace Listings for Breguet