rijowysock
888
i just think the solid gold rotors
lend themself more aesthetically to the movement.. not saying more important than the dial..
the patek 5712 movement looks identical to the LUC 1.96, like every single gear is the same..
Same question revisited, MICRO ROTOR WATCHES..
brain keeps saying 5712, 5712, 5712, 5712, 5712, 5712,.... but i just dont know... i started looking at some L.U.C Chopard pieces with the 1.96 movment, but i keep thinking 5712.. can anyone reccomend a watch with a gold microrotor with display back, that...
PP 5110, 5130, 5102, 6000 ( If I'm not wrong for this last ), AND
Universal Geneve, too. Best. Nicolas This message has been edited by amanico on 2008-12-05 13:32:06
Not really, mkvc
Lange Automatic Watches don' use any micro rotor. I agree that it looks like, but it is a 3 Quarter Rotor, in fact. Best. Nicolas
I know little in this sort of stratosphere, however...
It seems to me that Chopard does as nice a job with their finishing of their micro-rotor movements as PP does. There is a comparison somewhere around here. At any rate, it would matter much more to me what the overall design of the watch (especially dial,...
i just think the solid gold rotors
lend themself more aesthetically to the movement.. not saying more important than the dial.. the patek 5712 movement looks identical to the LUC 1.96, like every single gear is the same..
