jptaylor
3
GP Perpetual Calendar 90535-52-131-BK6A
May 15, 2023,13:40 PM
Hi everyone!
There is very little information(the caliber GP033Q0 isn't listed on watchbase ) out there regarding the 1966 perpetual released as a limited edition in 2010 (i think). It looks like tremendous value for money, as these can be picked up sub 20K nowadays. Is there a catch? Is the perpetual calendar movement bad in any ways? Is it integrated or perhaps modular, as is the case with IWCs? If anyone knows or owns this watch, please share your thoughts!
Comments:
view entire thread
GP Perpetual Calendar 90535-52-131-BK6A
By: jptaylor : May 15th, 2023-13:40
Hi everyone! There is very little information(the caliber GP033Q0 isn't listed on watchbase ) out there regarding the 1966 perpetual released as a limited edition in 2010 (i think). It looks like tremendous value for money, as these can be picked up sub 2...
I agree with mdg
By: andrea~ : May 15th, 2023-14:39
The movement is clearly too small for the case (or, more likely, vice versa). The subdials should be farther apart. They make the watch look cheap.
GP is still making the same mistakes
By: SingaporeMarc : May 15th, 2023-16:29
Even after becoming independent. The can not seem to control their ADs and manage inventory and distribution to match demand β¦ I mean really demand and not spend history requirements from some ADs for buyers to get a Patek. Patrick the CEO even talked abo...
LOL!!!
By: amanico : May 15th, 2023-20:34
=)))))
By: amanico : May 16th, 2023-06:27
ROFL!
By: amanico : May 16th, 2023-06:25
ππ
By: FabR : May 16th, 2023-06:56
as others already stated
By: christianch : May 15th, 2023-22:45
The catch is a very small modular movement that makes it visually ugly and, difficult to read. What I experienced myself with other brands perpetual calendars is that the devil is in the detail and these small sub-dials can be incredibly difficult to read...