GP Perpetual Calendar 90535-52-131-BK6A

May 15, 2023,13:40 PM
 

Hi everyone!


There is very little information(the caliber GP033Q0 isn't listed on watchbase ) out there regarding the 1966 perpetual released as a limited edition in 2010 (i think). It looks like tremendous value for money, as these can be picked up sub 20K nowadays. Is there a catch? Is the perpetual calendar movement bad in any ways? Is it integrated or perhaps modular, as is the case with IWCs? If anyone knows or owns this watch, please share your thoughts!




  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

With the location of the subdials...

 
 By: mdg : May 15th, 2023-14:05
...I would think that the movement must be tiny...

I agree with mdg

 
 By: andrea~ : May 15th, 2023-14:39
The movement is clearly too small for the case (or, more likely, vice versa). The subdials should be farther apart. They make the watch look cheap.

It is a modular construction, which is not a bad thing nor a flaw in itself.

 
 By: amanico : May 15th, 2023-15:33
The main problem is the size of the movement ( 26 mm ), which is way too small for this case. Which has a visual impact on the dial, with these too centered sub dials. A pity, because this watch is super interesting. Another factor, which I would call tra... 

GP is still making the same mistakes

 
 By: SingaporeMarc : May 15th, 2023-16:29
Even after becoming independent. The can not seem to control their ADs and manage inventory and distribution to match demand … I mean really demand and not spend history requirements from some ADs for buyers to get a Patek. Patrick the CEO even talked abo... 

And look at this standard of marketing

 
 By: SingaporeMarc : May 15th, 2023-17:11
It looks like this guy has his hand on a public toilet floor … πŸ€¦πŸ»β€β™‚οΈ ...  

LOL!!!

 
 By: amanico : May 15th, 2023-20:34

It can’t have been viewed from that far away.

 
 By: TheMadDruid : May 15th, 2023-21:05
Toilet stalls are only 6 feet deep.

😜 naughty and funny

 
 By: SingaporeMarc : May 16th, 2023-05:03

=)))))

 
 By: amanico : May 16th, 2023-06:27

ROFL!

 
 By: amanico : May 16th, 2023-06:25

πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‰

 
 By: FabR : May 16th, 2023-06:56

Pleasure!

 
 By: amanico : May 15th, 2023-20:34

as others already stated

 
 By: christianch : May 15th, 2023-22:45
The catch is a very small modular movement that makes it visually ugly and, difficult to read. What I experienced myself with other brands perpetual calendars is that the devil is in the detail and these small sub-dials can be incredibly difficult to read...