The more pics I see the more I am intrigued by this watch. Love the dial. Nothing like those subdials/display. One the one hand definite Journe DNA, on the other unlike anything done before. The chrono hands would be mesmerizing.
But as I consider ordering my own, there are some issues that create pause. Doubt it is possible in a mechanical wristwatch to time remotely near 1/100 sec, even if for no other reason than human reaction tiime. So seems that the flying hand may be more an optical achievement than anything else. And I wonder if this design which seems to push mechanical limits will present undue service headaches in the future.
I am no movement expert, but I frankly expected to see a more impressive view of the chrono movement. Call me spoiled by the Datograph, but my expectation was that a revolutionary chrono might be even more impressive from the back than the front. Love the RG Journe movements, but this one does not draw me in.
Wish I could handle one in the metal to play with the chrono rocker. Clearly the Centigraphe is not meant to be a classic chrono. Maybe it is the next step in chronos. But I also miss the symmetry of chrono pushers surrounding a large crown. So at the moment this design is exciting, and maybe even easier to use than standard pushers, but I wonder if that excitement will grow or diminish with time.
Some of my concerns may not be fair without seeing the watch in the metal. I would certainly guess this watch has the legendary Journe fit on the wrist. All in all I wonder if the Centigraphe is a revolutionary chronograph, partly a gimmick, or somewhere in between.
This message has been edited by tahoeblue on 2009-04-07 22:44:38