WPS member · Independents forum
21 replies2495 views1 photos
Jay (Eire) challenges conventional wisdom about travel watches, opting for an Urwerk on an extended trip despite its perceived lack of versatility. His decision to prioritize security over daily wearability sparks a fascinating discussion on the practicalities of traveling with high-value independent timepieces. This article explores the unique considerations collectors face when taking their most prized possessions on the road.
While I took the Furlan Marri for those suit/shirt days I really couldn’t go without something more substantial for several weeks away. For the first time ever I took the Urwerk.
Definitely not the most versatile of watches, which is usually the prerequisite for travel. But not having to rely on a hotel safe it was easier to take a watch that I wouldn’t need to wear daily and could leave at home without worry.
Key Points from the Discussion
- The Urwerk experienced unexplained stopping and starting during the trip, an issue the author attributes to infrequent wear in a large collection where no single watch gets extended wrist time.
- A contributor argues that such issues should not occur in the Urwerk's price range, regardless of its mechanical complexity, sharing an anecdote about a friend's new Audemars Piguet perpetual calendar that also stopped shortly after purchase.
- The author expresses hesitation about sending the watch for service due to the anticipated lengthy turnaround time, preferring to continue wearing it regularly unless the stopping issue recurs or a direct replacement is available.
- A lighthearted query about the Urwerk's robust case design suggests its potential for unconventional uses, highlighting the watch's distinctive and substantial build.
Advertisement
Continue the conversation
This thread is active on the Independents forum with 21 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →