Discussion
Besançon's original post sparks a compelling discussion on the aesthetic and practical merits of steel versus ceramic bezels on the Rolex Daytona. His preference for the steel bezel on his Rolex Daytona 116520 highlights a key debate among collectors regarding durability and design. This article delves into community insights, exploring why the choice of bezel material continues to be a significant factor for enthusiasts.
The Daytona reference 116520 represents a significant evolution within the Cosmograph Daytona line, being the first to feature Rolex's in-house developed chronograph movement. This reference marked a departure from previous models that utilized outsourced calibers, establishing a new benchmark for the brand's commitment to vertical integration and precision engineering in its sports watch offerings. It maintained the classic Daytona aesthetic while introducing subtle refinements.
The watch is presented in a 40mm Oystersteel case, featuring a fixed tachymeter bezel also crafted from Oystersteel. Powering the timepiece is the automatic Caliber 4130, a self-winding mechanical chronograph movement known for its robust construction and a substantial power reserve of 72 hours. A scratch-resistant sapphire crystal protects the dial, and the watch is water-resistant to a depth of 100 meters, ensuring durability and functionality.
Appealing to collectors interested in the technical advancements of Rolex, the 116520 is recognized for its role in the brand's history of movement development. It is available with either a white or black dial, both featuring contrasting sub-dials that enhance legibility and visual interest. The reference was produced for a considerable period, making it a recognizable and sought-after model for those appreciating the blend of traditional design with modern horological innovation.
Love the fact that the Rolex God blessed me in 2009 with a 116520! Switched out the bracelet for a black alligator/red lizard - love it!
The cracking bezel might be happening on the 116500 reference where the ceramic is exposed(never heard of that myself), but with the metallic ring on the 12xxxx I highly doubt that, because that is the exact point of the ring, to protect the bezel…
hardness of the steel and ceramic bezels, or how easy they break. But aesthetically I prefer the steel bezel to the ceramic one. My personal preference only.
Great trio, the steel is certainly a different aesthetic and a good one! However the ceramic is also certainly not fragile but I love Daytona in all its configurations.
The Rolex Daytona 116520 is the first true Rolex Daytona in history, as it is the first Daytona with an in-house movement. There really is nothing more to add.
This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 15 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
