Independents
Amanico's striking photographs of the Rexhep Rexhepi Chronomètre Contemporain in rose gold offer a visual feast, inviting WatchProSite members to appreciate its aesthetic marvel. His post serves as a gateway to a deeper discussion, prompting collectors to weigh the watch's celebrated design against critical perspectives on its horological significance and brand experience.
Is that N4?! Two friends of mine own both the older and younger sibling of this watch! N3 & N5 RG
Here's a macro of the dial belonging to the prototype. Regards, Baruch
This is far from the norm and please don't paint good, honest independents with the same brush. Not all independents are the same.
He's a fan of vintage, time-tested movements as well as their modernized versions. He sees a lot of in-house movements in for repair. But hey, a really well finished bricked movement sure looks nice in pictures.
That many times doesn’t work. I’m trying to understand the mania surrounding this watch and the very young maker that led to a million dollar auction result recently. I have to admit, at one point, I was also swept up by it to a degree. But now when I look at this watch, I see an homage piece to vintage Calatravas. This isn’t breaking any new horological ground. Some will argue that the finishing is exceptional. To them, I would say is fine finishing really the most important part of a watch? An
Mechanical watches will break at some point but I have heard the service is horrible where customers need to wait well over a year to get the watch back. Also a friend’s watch was used as a display model to allow other visitors to play with while it’s stuck in service for well over a year. It’s ridiculous
This thread is active on the Independents forum with 46 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
